This imperfect, somewhat fractured, perhaps too short and certainly incomplete book is well worth reading. It is not a novel, and thus perhaps requires that we try to put the people that we know into the applicable slots. I myself, for example, can imagine many strong Inez's trying by hook or by crook to survive as migrants in a hostile social environment. It is a more-or-less coherent (the extractive invasion seems somewhat forced though quite real) collection of allegorical vignettes, underlain by tactics of non-violent and democratic resistance, and accompanied by a narrative thread about two people in love who try to affect change in a world of fear, hate and propaganda. Many who are quite well-versed in techniques of confronting authoritarian public figures (e.g. Medea Benjamin and Cindy Sheehan) find that the book resonates closely with their work.
I found myself, fortunately or unfortunately (I don't like to think of Rand's book), thinking often of Atlas Shrugged as I went through this book. The philosophies and tones informing these books could not be more opposite. Atlas Shrugged was a celebration of self-aggrandizement; a call for completing the transformation of society ("the needy") into economy ("subjection of nature to The Individual Mind"); an imagining of capitalist accumulation as the epitome of "voluntary," "moral" and "non-violent" humanity; and a deeply hateful and revengeful "taking back what was stolen from /me/."
The Dandelion Insurrection on the other hand is about the transformation of authoritarian hierarchy into independent, interdependent, creative solidarity. It is about living ecologically, rather than simply subordinating nature to the industrial form. It is about the "questionable" judgment of trusting people to respond positively when one non-violently pleads for them to be human. It is about strong and real women (with wombs!) leading the way rather than following as the really sterile Dagny Taggart does in Atlas (I apologize in arrears for speaking, probably out of turn, of that which I cannot know or feel).
However, the narratives run almost in parallel. For Rand, "the workers/populace" are mostly a nameless mass dependent upon the named industrialists and under the sway of the named "mystics of mind and muscle." For Sun, the corporate and government elite (industrialists) are the largely nameless ones (The Greenbacks), living in fear of the diversity of characters that are local community. The main characters in each book are defined by a courtroom trial, unsuccessful attempts by "the government" (yes, both are quite critical of authoritarian "government") to shut the populace out of the proceedings, and fairly soon afterwards a glimpse into the "final cleaning."
It is important to also note that Gene Sharp, the inspiration for The Dandelion Insurrection, was also quite often referenced in regard to the "Arab Spring" uprisings particularly in Egypt. I think history will show, however, that at least phases I and II (we are in phase II) of the Egyptian uprising were run in a manner agreeable to the global elite (U.S. government, Israel, M.E. dictators, etc.). Look where we are; back to a dictator who is, if anything, more subservient to Washington and the IMF. Nothing is easy or clean about the longue durée of transformation.