Not what I was expecting, and it's disappointing. I first heard about this book during an episode of Top Chef All-Stars, when the author was a guest. I never felt the need to own the book (coffee table books don't entice me), but when I saw it at the library I thought it would be enjoyable to read once. Between the discussion on Top Chef, the dust jacket description, the fact that it was shelved in the cooking section of the library (641.5092: Cooking; History, Geographic Treatment, Biography), and the cover phrasing ("50 Great Chefs and Their Final Meals, Portraits, Interviews, and Recipes), I really thought this was a book about the chefs and about food. I had somehow visualized it as a much more personal book. I expected the chefs to be photographed with the meals they selected, maybe with some of the family they'd like to enjoy the meal with. Basically I expected the photographs to serve the content, to give me a window into the chefs. Instead this is a photography book in which the subject matter is little more than a gimmick. They're very arty photographs (Giorgio Locatelli in front of an aluminum wall hung all over with mackerel, Mario Batali with radishes draped over his head, Wylie Dufresne in lounging pin-up pose with a slice of cheese hanging out of his mouth) that, in general, do nothing more than reinforce the public face of the chef. Exceptions to this--positive ones--include Michelle Bernstein, Suzanne Goin, and Tetsuya Wakuda.
Anthony Bourdain's introduction is phrased as if written by someone who has seen the final product, but I can only assume he'd seen only the photographs, because he talks about how chefs have eaten the best foods in the world, but when asked this question, they say they want "poor-people food". "A crust of bread and butter". He discusses how in response to this question, chefs revert to childhood pleasures. Yet most of the chefs in this book say they want caviar, otoro tuna, foie gras, truffles, and very expensive wines or champagne. The introduction set me up to expect a sweet, heartfelt series of responses, when what I read was sheer indulgence in very expensive food.
The other disappointing aspect is how much of a Q&A this book is. Clearly the author sent her list of questions to each chef and they sent back their answers. I thought this would be conversations or small essays, not form questionnaires. Between the art photography and the "answer these 6 questions" format, the meals don't take shape for me. They become just a list of foods, in most cases with no background, and I find that I rarely care about the meal because it's just like reading a menu with no dish descriptors: black type on a white page. Speaking of which, on many pages one answer was printed in large type across the full two-page spread and it got lost in the crease. A book that retails at $40 should have done a better job with layout such that I wouldn't have to break the spine to find the word "it" in Masa Takayama's response.
The recipes clearly aren't intended to be made by the reader. After all, the first listed recipe is Cod Foam, which requires an iSi soda siphon, N2O (nitrous oxide) cartridge, silpats, fondant sugar paste, etc. There's also a recipe for "the huge, almost prehistoric-looking spider crabs of Asturias", a salad that calls for pig's foot, tail, ear, and snout, and a dish calling for cactus salad as one ingredient.
The pros are 1) the chefs selected, these are impressive names to have gotten to participate (and she got 50 more to participate in her follow-up, though that one includes more celebrity cooks than fine chefs). 2) The photos aren't what I'd want from the project but they are at least good quality.