I found this book important. I believe that true philowsophy and contempt of deity are two opposites. Where there is no freedom of thought there is no possiblity of truth. For something to be true it must also be good because all truth is derived from goodness and not vice versa like the bulk of the scientic community seem to believe. Dawkins espouses alot of facts that he wants to pass off as true but they are not good and therefore not true. At best, some of what he has to say is accurate but this is not the same as being true . I believe both in God and that things have evolved. I also trust that the human mind has been given not to be spent pondering God's existence but to come to understand the revelations God has given and continues to give. Science shouldnt be allowed to prevent this by banishing imagination and perception and championing cold intellect and biased ideologies. They can reason all day long and find themselves no further in their pursuit of truth. What they dont seem to understand is that perception has very little to do with reason but is a faculty of sight. Where there is no vision the people perish. For humanity to progress we need to champion love and goodness above all else. From what I can see Science is becoming a very dangerous religion in and of itself, with no special advantage over the very religions it has vome to critisize. There is only one true religion and it is where what is good and true is prized above all else. History depicts this. Dawkins says why does God hide himself? I say only the pure of heart can see God and without the right mindset, all of his intelligence is wasted in the darkness.