(If you enjoy this series, idk, maybe read a different review. If you have an hour to spare, and you enjoy rant reviews, welcome. Spoilers up ahead I guess but who cares you won't read this anyway)
Let me start off by saying that yes, I hated book 1 with my whole being and still decided to read book 2. I got gifted this series by a friend who enjoyed them and since book 1 ever so slightly improved towards the end, I wanted to give it a second try. I haven't decided yet if fully dnf'ing a gift or if hate-reading a gift is worse, but I clearly went for the second option, and I still feel really bad. Nevertheless, I think there is value in purposely reading books you know you won't like, just to heighten your critical senses and determine your specific taste in books. I am an avid YA reader and love me some dystopian, so this wasn't the problem here.
For the things I enjoyed:
- this read SO fast, the only reason I didn't give up like 30 pages in. any more than 3 days of hate-reading is not worth the time
- cat
The things I disliked:
- TOO LONG. WHY 400+ PAGES? Like a third of the words, paragraphs and sometimes entire scenes in this feel like filler. This is mostly because of the writing (don't worry, we'll get to it), but also just because the main character cannot make a fucking decision and needs to ponder EVERY detail (and then sometimes makes super rash and stupid decisions so really she just needs to get her shit together. There is a reason given for this, though, but don't worry, we'll get to it.)
- So? unrealistic? Yes, it's a dystopian, but I'm not necessarily talking about the plot or setting or world (although nothing is really properly explained, which is sort of the purpose, but becomes annoying real quick). It's the characters and their interactions and dialogue that felt off, the family dynamics are so weird, the hospital visit and class scenes are too short and don't add anything most of the time, AAAAA
- The characters are onedimensional and flat, boring, have very unclear motivations for certain behaviours, are somehow both predictable and completely unhinged (not in a fun way), and NONE OF THEM make you want to root for them.
- Every. Single. One. of the male characters is just sooooo in love with Kyla (including the teachercultleader GROSS) who is not like other girls and is special and unique
- The writing is BAD (told you I'd get to it). Half the sentences in this book are written in question form because KyLa iS cOnFuSeD aNd LoSt hEr MeMoRiEs, except really what it does is show that the author struggles with writing character reflection and foreshadowing, and instead just chucks questions at the reader's head that you're just supposed to answer as the book goes on (except you can't because everything is vague and once you do get answers, you have read about 300 questions and who fucking knows what they were?). Additionally, there is no nice writing in this, nothing to show off the author's skill at stringing words together. Nothing. It's all just there to serve a purpose and basic and yet somehow mostly waffle (but without the syrup!!! What a good fucking metaphor I should be a writer)
- NOTHING WAS A SURPRISE. The plot twists were so predictable, I saw things coming dozens, sometimes hundreds of pages before it happened. Again, bad foreshadowing skills (aka writing HEY CAN I TRUST THIS GUY like 20 times and then expecting the reader to be surprised when we find out that hey, we couldn't)
- Eh there's probably more but now onto the worse stuff
Things that I hated and none of the reviews here seem to talk about:
- There is some sort of attempt at making the Lorders and Free UK both seem morally grey, but really it's fuck the Lorders and Free UK is probably the ones you should sorta be rooting for because it has some good people in it. Also I hate the name Free UK because it reminds me of Brexit (WHICH THIS BOOK PREDICTED BTW??? AND RIOTS IN THE 2020S???? i lost my shit this is also a thing i liked i should've mentioned it sooner ok back to the regularly scheduled programming). This could have been an incredible discussion of how politics are never black or white and how people that fight for a big cause may be too blinded to see how awful they are being to reach their goals. If you want to read about a government vs terrorist group that are both kinda terrible but also kinda right, the Chaos Walking trilogy by Patrick Ness is fucking phenomenal and so nuanced.
- Mental, physical and sexual abuse are just kinda... idk, not questioned or contested. That might happen in book 3, but when a character talks about her abuse situation, it's just like "oh bad lorders :(" and that's about it. The main Free UK guy is emotionally manipulative like all hell, and is constantly given a pass because he's just so handsoooome. I think the way this grown ass Nico character speaks to literal children can be really triggering to people, so please be careful (should you for some godforsaken reason still wanna pick this up after reading this review???). Also a lot of violence and death and harm is used for shock value and nothing else.
- Lastly, mental health is handled incredibly poorly. Kyla is a flat, boring kid because her memories were wiped, and overthinks EVERYTHING, and then suddenly sneaks out at midnight to go fight a bitch (told you I'd get to it!!!!). She also remembers and dreams about her past life - or lives, because these fragments seem very disjointed. You wanna know why? (Spoiler I guess). Because the terrorist group purposely TRAUMATISED and ABUSED her into splitting her into two different identities, meaning she has three identities during this book. Now, as a psych major, I picked up on this very much sounding like a terribly handled, incredibly inaccurate, and frankly offensive and harmful portrayal of dissociative identity disorder (DID). However, since the audience is assumed to be dumb, there luckily is a doctor character that eventually gives an almost textbook definition of DID (I will give credit where it's due - at least they didn't use the outdated multiple personality disorder term) - literally, word for word the disorder is name dropped to explain what Kyla is experiencing (which she really isn't considering the DSM criteria, and also, where's your APA citation?). Please, writers, stop using random disorders as excuses for behaviour, especially when doing so incorrectly. This is incredibly harmful and stereotypes a group of people that is already constantly ridiculed accused of faking their disorder.
Now that it's nearly 1am, I will stop ranting and probably think of other stuff to add as I try to fall asleep but eh.. please don't text if you see me reading book 3 anytime soon. Thanks.