RISK is a novel by a British writer whom I met last year at a book fair in France. He never intended, he said, to be a writer, but after living in the Vienne, an area of France several hundred miles southwest of Paris, he began to notice markers that commemorated World War II encounters, and he began to talk to long time residents who had war experiences, and he felt he had to make something of this, and what emerged was historical fiction.
The German occupation of France extended along the coast line and a few miles inland. Beyond that was the "free zone", unoccupied by the Germans. The Vienne had not really known war since the 15th century, but the final days of World War II brought fighting here for the first time in centuries. Americans and British paratroopers made drops in the area to coordinate efforts with the maquis, the French guerrilla resistance movement whose aim was to harass the Germans and impede their war effort, particularly successful after the Normandy invasion of June, l944. Heavy guerilla fighting went on Limousin area near Limoges, just south of the Vienne.
What Vance has done is write a fictionalized story about a young Brit who is caught up in battle early in the war, and flees south to escape capture. After he makes his way across the Pyrenees and back to England, he is recruited to work as a spy. His mother was French and he is fluent in both English and French, an invaluable asset. He is to work with the maquis in smuggling spies and grounded Allied paratroopers through an underground system of safe houses and escape routes that ultimately let people flee the war zone by way of little traveled routes through the Pyrenees.
Vance draw both on his knowledge of England where he has lived, as well as in France, he and has obviously done a lot of historical research. He creates added tension with a love story that involves the Brit who is engaged to be married in England, but simultaneously torn by his attraction to a young French woman who works with him in the resistance movement. It's a tragic situation, a little contrived, I thought, but Vance has a surprise ending which works very well - he jumps forward 70 years to 2011 to tie up some puzzling aspects of his story.
I don't read a lot of historical fiction, but to repeat, his story is well-researched and a reader learns a lot about how the French resistance movement operated during the war. Some of the dialogue struck me as a bit clunky, too much expository information being worked in, and occasionally the story slides into patriotic stereotypes, but these are minor quibbles.