This book surprised me a number of times, how come I haven’t read it until now? How come it’s such a massive read? How come Benson is so critical of a phenomenon he does seem to love?
The last question was the best surprise - Benson is truly critical - of anything! A single out of character line in one of the original novels, a flaw in an early movie that no one else bothers with...
I disagree with the author plenty, mainly in the praise of the inferior “Colonel Sun” and of Gardner’s continuation of the series. But also on some of the movies, themes, actors.
However, I find myself often being in the company of a kindred mind; I wonder if I should go on to read the Benson Bond’s - I mean the man does really think that the last true - or at least, proper, Bond movie, was “Goldfinger”!
It’s a great book for fans, the methodical, thorough and personal run-through of all books & all films following a long detailed biography of Fleming is great reading. My copy was updated in 1988 and even if I’d love to find out what Benson thought of Dalton’s second outing as 007 (and the fact that it was his last), I think this covers most of my real interest. Mind-blowing though that the fascination in the book is the survival of Bond from 1953 to 1988 and here we are in 2020, soon to double that span...