This work studies the developmental distinction in Western thought between political slavery and chattel slavery, especially as this difference emerges in c17 English literature. Often, political slavery is denounced in the same breath that chattel slavery is upheld. Thus, Nyquist investigates how early modern anti-political slavery, descending from the anti-tyranny classical Greek discourses, at times upholds chattel slavery while denouncing political slavery. Further, Nyquist portrays how, strangely enough, absolutist discourses, such as Bodin and Hobbes, denounce chattel slavery precisely because they are absolute monarchists.