A FINE EXPLANATION OF A NUMBER OF DISPUTED POINTS IN THE GOSPEL ACCOUNTS
Pastor David Wiersbe and his father Warren Wiersbe wrote in the Preface to this 2012 book, “Throughout the centuries, so many traditions had woven themselves into Christmas that it’s becoming difficult to understand what the Advent season is all about. This book is an attempt to add some depth and meaning and some spiritual insight to your Christmas celebration… The better we understand the historical and doctrinal foundations of the magnificent Christmas event, the more exciting and enriching this special day becomes.”
They explain, “The Church year begins with the season of Advent… this is a time when Christians look back to Christ’s first coming in Bethlehem and look ahead to His coming again. Our readers may question this emphasis on Advent. After all, there’s nothing in Scripture that commands Christians to keep this season… We are certainly not insisting that every believer must acknowledge Advent, nor should it be a test of Christian fellowship… The season of Advent was first mentioned in writing about AD 380 in Spain, as a time of fasting prior to celebrating the nativity… by 581 most churches made pre-Christmas preparations.” (Pg. 16-17)
They note, “The English word ‘Christmas’ dates from the twelfth century. In Old English it was two words, ‘Christes maesse’… Literally it meant ‘Christ’s mass’ and referred to the special worship service held on December 25 in honor of the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ… In Greek the … first letter looks like the English letter ‘X.’ … those in the church used the letter chi (X) to represent Christ … ‘Xmas’ is an honorable abbreviation for Christmas. It was not intended to take Christ out of Christmas…” (Pg. 38-39)
They point out, “The story of Mary in labor and Joseph desperately seeking shelter and the innkeeper refusing them a room because his establishment is full, is dramatic---and probably fiction… Bethlehem … was a busy town when Joseph and Mary arrived due to all the individuals and families there to register for the census… Most out-of-town guests would have stayed with relatives, but even that kind of housing probably filled up quickly… The idea that Mary was in labor when they arrived in town is probably wrong. It was after they arrived that her labor began. The word for ‘inn’… would be better translated ‘guest room.’ The word is never used for a public guest facility… ‘No room for them in the inn’ would be interpreted to mean that ‘the guest room’ was full at a relative’s house. Most houses … had an upper and lower level. The lower level was where the family’s animals were kept… Animals would be fed at a manger (made of wood or stone). If there was no room available in the main part of the house… Mary and Joseph… could have gone to the lower-level sleeping quarters. And this is where Mary gave birth to Jesus. Then the manger… would have made a convenient cradle… By the time the Magi arrived … Joseph and Mary and baby Jesus were living in a house. So the ‘barn’ was only temporary quarters.” (Pg. 96-97)
They observe, “It must have been unusual to put a newborn baby in a manger, because that was one of the signs the angel gave to the shepherds for finding the Christ Child. Evidently the shepherds knew the places in Bethlehem that would have a manger, and they found Joseph, Mary, and Jesus without difficulty.” (Pg. 132)
They state, “‘So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets, ‘He shall be called a Nazarene.’ [Mt 2:23] Students and teachers have wrestled with that statement because this prophecy cannot be found in ONE of the prophetic books, let alone several of them… To relate ‘Nazarene’ to the word ‘Nazarite’ is erroneous, because Jesus was not a Nazarite like John the Baptist… Luke records at least two occasions when Jesus touched dead bodies, and this was forbidden to Nazarites … and He also drank wine… We must not ignore the fact that Matthew wrote ‘prophets’ and not ‘prophet.’ … What one thing about the Christ did all the Old Testament prophets write about? He would be despised and rejected by the people… Many of the people of Judah considered Nazareth a town of backward people… In calling Jesus ‘the Nazarene,’ people could be identifying His hometown but also ridiculing Him and rejecting His claims.” (Pg. 141-142)
They assert, “We do not know how many Magi were in the group… The fact that three gifts are mentioned has led people to think that three men were involved, but that conclusion could be wrong… These wise men … were part of a large camel train of servants and soldiers and supplies. If three strangers showed up in Jerusalem, it wouldn’t make much of a stir; but when a large and rich-looking foreign company appeared, everybody took notice, especially King Herod… the wise men … did not see a newborn baby… but a young child…” (Pg. 188)
Later, they reiterate, “‘Xmas’ is an honorable abbreviation for ‘Christmas.’ … The truth about the origin of ‘Xmas’ will probably not cure the misbelief that ‘Xmas’ is an attempt to remove Christ from Christmas. So if you’re going to use ‘Xmas,’ do so with friends … who will not doubt your reverence for Christ.” (Pg. 200)
This book will be of keen interest to Christians wanting to know more of the historical background of the gospel stories.