Pivotal, ahead of it's time and completely life altering!
I would rate it 5 stars as a solid foundation to build comprehension in the field of Mindbody disorders, however, it's not the 'Be all and End all'.
I believe it's crucial to get your head around Sarno's work before diving into more modern neuroscience. While his approach may be effective in many cases, some further nuance can be applied to his treatments.
So here's the break down of what I thought about his teachings:
Sarno discusses how *emotions can be perceived as threats by the body*, which when repressed, can trigger the nervous system. The nervous system is responsible for a bunch of bodily processes and can initiate sensations, symptoms and pain in our bodies. This concept makes perfect sense and I see it being highly applicable to a range of health practices.
Sarno's theory of us having 'Emotional Reservoirs' is also a useful illustration of how repressed emotions contribute to pain. It explains why one event may have affected us more (physically) than another event. Why some people seem more sensitive to their environments than other people. The answer lies in their emotional reservoir, how full it is or in other words, how many emotions they've left unacknowledged.
Sarno poses that *rage* is a primary emotion behind chronic pain. I'm not completely on board with Sarno's hyperfocus on this emotion. It's valid and likely very common, but in my experience, other feelings may be louder than rage for some people, such as grief.
The way Sarno links emotions to the nervous system and the nervous system to pain responses is gold to the over-intellectauliser. He goes into depth about the structural processes that are taking place in the body. I believe the reason his system is so successful is because people suffering with chronic pain are often over-intellectualisers by nature and it's an explanation that they can easily adopt. So for Sarno's first call of treatment to be education is not unexpected. Especially since he pins nervous system disregulation on 'Repressed' (not supressed) emotions, which can only be acknowledged logically. However, my own experience is that we escape our feelings further by over-intellectualising. It's a trauma response we've formed to distract from our emotional pain. While the education might be a great launching pad for recovery, it's simply not enough. If true recovery is hinged entirely on education as Sarno suggests, it excludes entire demographics of people with reduced cognitive function, maturity and learning styles (elderly, children, physical learners, etc.). It also doesn't explain how people healed from their symptoms without this information, before this time, before our brains developed to need this level of intellectual answers.
While I don't disagree with Sarno's diagnosis of repressed emotions contributing to pain, I would add that treating soley 'repressed' emotions isn't the answer. Facing 'supressed' emotions might be a more effective treatment. Through further research and cross-referencing with other practitioners in the field, I resonated more with Dr. Mickel's approach in this specific instance. In Mickel therapy there's the concept of thought-created emotions and body-emotions. Body emotions are our true emotions and before the rumination. We deal with them by acknowledging them in the present moment, especially when we get a symptom flare. By real-time 'ALLOWING' not 'DIGGING' for emotions/causes, we tell our brains we are safe to experience our emotions. This signals to the body the need symptoms is no longer necessary. The purpose symptoms bring are already being addressed.
In my experience of EMDR therapy, it was explained to me that our traumas are all linked up. The feelings evoked by each trauma all-cross over like an intricate web. Sometimes we can heal from one trauma by addressing another, even if it happened at a later date. Of course, this doesn't mean we avoid them IF emotions from these traumas come up. I like to imagine this webbed healing phenomenon is what happens when we ALLOW ourselves to feel emotions as they arise - even if they do not make logical sense at the time. Feeling them in our body rather than justifying them in our minds. Perhaps, this is why Sarno instructs us to acknowledge we have 'repressed' emotions and leave it at that, so we don't go digging, caught up in a never-ending quest to 'release' ALL of them. I imagine people could get quite neurotic with 'releasing' and probably setback their recovery further because of it. From what I'm learning, when emotions are 'addressed' and 'completed' they naturally release on their own, there is no need to force it. 'The Great Allowing' on Youtube discusses the dangers of *releasing* emotions before we've integrated the message they're sending us. Often they'll get released just to come back again, because there is no change or safety for that emotional experience to dissipate into. The emotions come back and are re-triggered because we still need them to protect us. Often they come back stronger, as we've learnt, emotions that aren't given conscious space will get our attention through pain and symptoms instead.
The idea that symptoms are a means to distract us from our emotional pain is very useful and I believe that framework would work well for some people. However, the explanation feels a little outdated for me. It suggests symptoms are obstacles to outsmart, rather than our messengers to listen and learn from. Sarno's approach is liberating and effective because it dissuades us from feeding our symptoms with fear. The ability to remove fear from the experience of symptoms is a common thread among all chronic illness recovery stories on the internet. While Sarno's philosophy is helpful, I prefer a more embodied reframing. Instead, I see symptoms as the louder voice of suppressed emotions... trying harder to get our attention (not to distract).
Also, the stories Sarno shared of people pushing through their symptoms with physical movement lacks some discernment. I get it. But it might not be a good idea for people who's body has deconditioned since they got their chronic pain diagnosis and are expecting themselves to be at the same fitness level that were before its onset. Sarno is not directly suggesting we jump straight back into physical activity, not at all... but I just thought some of the stories where that happened were a little careless to share within the context.
Oh... and also forgot to mention the 'Symptom Imperative' which Sarno coined. It describes how we can have symptoms that change locations, or present differently but are still a result of the same core issue. For example, anxiety becoming depression, back pain changing to leg pain, having both migraines and IBS but at different times in the day or week. The myth that each symptom is localised and separate makes treating Mindbody disorders even more illusive. The symptom imperitive is a super intriguing idea and I 100% believe it.
So those are my thoughts, thanks for reading! Hope it was insightful (:
I'd love to do a review where I cross-reference a bunch of practitioner's and their modalities. Maybe I'll do a video on my YT @breaking_open.
I haven't started posting yet but if you're interested in that lmk.