A guide to solving real-life dilemmas debunks time-honored cliche+a7s of religion and psychotherapy to encourage readers to develop a moral imagination. 25,000 first printing.
I just finished reading this as part of my Masters program coursework. Wow. I can see why this book is still in print after 28 years. References to Yuppies aside, the information and application guidance the author covers on morality and ethics in our day to day life still works in today's world. Maybe even more so with social media's presence all around us.
Well worth reading--not because one should agree with his answers (what few he provides) but because one should be thinking about the questions he raises. Also the writing is entertaining, keeping the subject from getting dry. Thought provoking.
Would like to give this book 3.5 stars, as I believe it deserves better than just three. Published in the early nineties, this book uses philosophy to look as everyday areas of our lives in order to try and give us answers (friendships, romance, judging, values, morals, etc.).
For the most part, the book does a great job of making these philosophical points easy to digest by breaking it down. There are only certain areas where the author dives deeper into the philosophical and technical sides that are harder to follow.
Taking into account how the book is older, this book is a great read with a lot of interesting points to the way we live our lives and some helpful observations and tips to keep in mind.
Written for readers who are not students of philosophy or ethics, this introduces some practical problems and questions and offers ways to think creatively about values and judgment, and it holds up rather well decades after publication.
It’s an argumentative book with a distinct personality. Amusingly, one chapter is devoted to exhorting the reader not to be misled by clichés, although the book opens by inviting us to entertain stereotypes about people to make some superficial points about how we interact and argue.
Joshua Halberstam is the king of strawmanning. Every chapter involves him describing these absurd caricatures of human beings and then using them to try to say to something interesting (keyword: try).
What is presented here is not "inspired solutions to real-life dilemmas" but "thoughts and comments on fabricated dilemmas the author came up with".
It's not all drivel but there's so much of it that it was hard for me to care about the rest.
Had to read this book for my class, it was very insightful and i actually loved it. It offers a new way of seeing life, while giving you the opportunity to formulate your own opinions, especially because it is fairly old.
Exceptional book. There were only a few paragraphs I found to be unhelpful. The rest is gold and worth the read for anyone trying to dip their toes into moral philosophy.
¿Cuándo fue la última vez que nos preguntamos qué es lo que verdaderamente importa y qué es lo vale la pena en la vida? El libro incentiva este tipo de pensamiento, la auto evaluación y el ejercicio filosófico. Cada aspecto de nuestra vida debe ser analizado constantemente. Dedicamos más tiempo en pensar en cosas triviales que en los aspectos realmente trascendentales de nuestra vida. Uno de los aspectos más afortunados del libros es el rescate del racionalismo crítico (principio de falsabilidad) de Kark Popper: cuando hagamos un juicio, o demos una opinión, hay que considerar nosotros mismos cuál sería su contraparte, qué argumento podría refutarlo, en qué podríamos estar equivocados; considerar la posibilidad de equivocación. El compromiso con la actitud crítica y la verdad.
Active listening skills mean paraphrasing and it is possible to control emotions to some extent. I read this a few years ago and it changed my outlook on dealing with my emotions. I had never developed the skill of managing negative emotions and working in spite of them. Still getting better at it.