Mary Cleary is an up and coming attorney it an influential law firm in New Your, the pride of the family, and especially her father. Then she is raped and refuses any counseling. She buys a gun and gets a dog, the walks the streets of New York, hoping to find her rapist and kill him. The rapist finds her first and attacks her. She kills him in self-defense; her life should be good now, but it gets worse. She quits her job, to her father’s dismay and returns to her home town, Buffalo. She takes a low level job in a childcare center and starts the road to rebuild her life. Ultimately she is called to jury duty. Trying to be a fair juror puts some unexpected demands on her.
This was a five-star book that went a little awry. The most serious problem was the choice to have the story told by a third person, all-knowing narrator. This choice tends to put the reader outside the story. As one example: suppose A and B are talking. The all-knowing narrator tells you what each person is thinking and feeling. However, if the conversation had followed from A’s point of view, the narrator tells the reader what A is thinking, feeling, and observing, but the reader can only tell what B is thinking and feeling by getting into A's skin to see what A observes. That could be B’s tone of voice, actions like raising an eyebrow, etc. In this situation, the reader is drawn into the story with A, experiencing what A experiences. In this book, I was mostly outside the story with the narrator watching it unfold.
The reasons for Cleary deciding to be on a jury were not convincing, and I’m sure if her problem became known, the defendant would win an appeal. Finally, the world “that” was used so much that it became so obvious that I felt that I was being overwhelmed with it.
In spite of the problems, I gave the book four stars because the story and the characters were so interesting they overcame the negatives.