This book is gripping enough that, after writing this, I'll probably go buy the sequel. But it had its flaws. Does nobody understand the purpose of a living, breathing proofreader anymore? People, seriously: SPELLCHECK IS NOT YOUR FRIEND!
This guy had homonym issues in his text. The obvious ones, like "Too" and "to," "It's" and "its," plus less ubiquitous homophones. He made weird word errors, like saying "enthusiastically" when he meant "exclusively." If it had happened once or twice, I would have written it off to a slipsies. But it happened every five or so pages. At one point, he called an object a "Einstein-Rosen Bridge wormhole." An Einstein-Rosen Bridge IS a wormhole; you didn't need to say both.
It seems like quibbling, and maybe it is. But those little things add up, especially for the quick reader like me. It looks unprofessional, and more importantly, every time it happened, it dumped me out of the story, as I had to go back and re-read and figure out what was actually meant. I guess I should have expected this; it's an indie publication. I'm all in favor of the independent movement in publishing, but this is one of the flaws in that world that needs to be addressed ASAP.
But for all my whinging, the stories were good (it was a series of connected shorts, rather than a linear novel). The lead is not a particularly likable character, but he was compelling, and I am interested to know more about him, and read more of his exploits. I'm a pushover for anything Lovecraftian, so he had me from the jump on that score, and he had some truly delicious creep-outs and images that will grab you by the throat and not let go (especially if you're a little nervous about going into the woods; that first short is gonna give me nightmares).
All in all, I do recommend the book. It's good scary fun, if you can look past the technical flaws.