What do you think?
Rate this book
The World As Will And Idea
This book was converted from its physical edition to the digital format by a community of volunteers. You may find it for free on the web. Purchase of the Kindle edition includes wireless delivery.
198 pages, Kindle Edition
Published January 3, 2012
About the author
Arthur Schopenhauer
2,183 books6,187 followersArthur Schopenhauer was born in the city of Danzig (then part of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth; present day Gdańsk, Poland) and was a German philosopher best known for his work The World as Will and Representation. Schopenhauer attempted to make his career as an academic by correcting and expanding Immanuel Kant's philosophy concerning the way in which we experience the world.
He was the son of author Johanna Schopenhauer and the older brother of Adele Schopenhauer.
He was the son of author Johanna Schopenhauer and the older brother of Adele Schopenhauer.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
November 20, 2022
Schopenhauer is one of the most influential philosophers of the 19th century, and yet is often left out of curricula or studies due to his gut wrenching pessimism. I would argue that this "pessimism" is misinterpreted. It is not a cry for nihilism, that all of life as will is endless striving and suffering. Rather, it is emptying the skeletons in the closet of humanity. Schopenhauer does not insist that you cannot strive, pursue goals, enjoy sexual pleasures etc. He instead pontificates that we acknowledge that these strivings are ultimately meaningless. We ought to seperate ourselves to some degree from the strivings of the will. By my interpretation, it is not necessary to embrace ascetisim in it's entirety, taking a vow of chastity, partaking in extreme fasts and giving away to others all that one has. What is required is that we do not rely entirely on the strivings of the will for our happiness.
The daunting title is actually a rather simple synthesis. Riding the Kantian wave(which was a tsunami at the time) Schopenhauer divides the world into two. The world as idea is the phenomenal world. It is named such because it is necessarily conceived within the subject object relationship, as ideas in the subject of the objects in the world. Thus in one sense the world only exists as idea in the minds of subjects.
Yet where Schopenhauer diverges from Kant is regarding the 'noumenal' world of things in themselves. Kant maintained we cannot have knowledge of noumena, only phenomena. Schopenhauer, on the contrary, says we can have knowledge of the noumenal world. He claims that through our wants and desires we have access to noumena. For example, say you feel thirsty, you desire a drink. There is no sense experience that triggered your thirst, you do not need to see a glass of water nor feel the heat of the sun inorder to be thirsty. Thus the world as will, the noumenal world, is revealed to us. Through sexual desire, desire to eat and drink, social desire etc. We feel the influence of the will directly, a priori to sense experience. This will, or will to life, pervades all phenomena, and connects all things, from a pebble to a human being to a star.
One can do what one wills, but one cannot will what one wills. We cannot influence the ways the will pulls us. We can, however, refuse to abide by its demands. This is the best way to live life for Schopenhauer, as ascetic rejection of the will. So doing will mean one no longer suffers, for one who does not strive does not yearn nor mourn.
The daunting title is actually a rather simple synthesis. Riding the Kantian wave(which was a tsunami at the time) Schopenhauer divides the world into two. The world as idea is the phenomenal world. It is named such because it is necessarily conceived within the subject object relationship, as ideas in the subject of the objects in the world. Thus in one sense the world only exists as idea in the minds of subjects.
Yet where Schopenhauer diverges from Kant is regarding the 'noumenal' world of things in themselves. Kant maintained we cannot have knowledge of noumena, only phenomena. Schopenhauer, on the contrary, says we can have knowledge of the noumenal world. He claims that through our wants and desires we have access to noumena. For example, say you feel thirsty, you desire a drink. There is no sense experience that triggered your thirst, you do not need to see a glass of water nor feel the heat of the sun inorder to be thirsty. Thus the world as will, the noumenal world, is revealed to us. Through sexual desire, desire to eat and drink, social desire etc. We feel the influence of the will directly, a priori to sense experience. This will, or will to life, pervades all phenomena, and connects all things, from a pebble to a human being to a star.
One can do what one wills, but one cannot will what one wills. We cannot influence the ways the will pulls us. We can, however, refuse to abide by its demands. This is the best way to live life for Schopenhauer, as ascetic rejection of the will. So doing will mean one no longer suffers, for one who does not strive does not yearn nor mourn.
May 7, 2021
This is a difficult text but wonderfully written/translated. I want to reread it particularly because Schopenhauer says I must, if I want to comprehend it, but mainly to get a better sense of Schopenhauer’s understanding of free will.
August 19, 2023
Outstanding, dense, and truly brilliant exposition. A philosophical masterpiece where East meets West. I particularly enjoy Schopenhauer’s exposition on the Will - it is clear the influence this had on Aleister Crowley as well as on Nietzsche.
June 29, 2018
I enjoyed being able to learn how Schopenhauer thought. I don't particularly feel a need to re-read it.
December 14, 2021
Schopenhauer's takes mostly on Kant. some gems here and there but mostly filler.
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews