This was a decent book; it held my attention, and it was written in a style that was eerily reminiscent of early Dean Koontz books. The plot was consistent and intriguing. The characters were believable, perhaps annoyingly so, especially for the main character, who I did not really attach to—he came across quite selfish and absorbed. There were several editing errors. Most of them involved poor use of commas and other punctuation (e.g. incorrectly applied—or more accurately, not applied—hyphens, semicolons, and dashes). There were a few extra quotation marks and a few missing quotation marks. However, the sentence structure was mostly correct, so the grammar errors were easier to overlook. I didn’t quite understand the correlation between the title of the book and the content; perhaps if I read the story again I would catch the relationship.
I didn’t like the ending. It wasn’t the plot that bothered me; it was the overall explanation for what was happening to the lead character. I understand this explanation was supposed to be a major plot twist; however, it felt as if the author had spent most of the story describing a situation, and then changed it at the very end in order to say “gotcha!” In addition, the final description of the bad guy’s ultimate fate seemed as if it was added at the last minute—it was an almost comical sentence; following it, the author finished it off with a comment about choice that made absolutely no sense given the preceding sentence—or the rest of the book, for that matter.
I don’t regret reading this book, but I probably wouldn’t read it again—that’s more the nature of suspense books than a response to the quality of the book.