A good book that is insightful, informative, illuminating and in some instances affirming as one who left an Evangelical meeting last year. I felt as though the author, a Quaker historian, had been a fly on the wall of my particular meeting. Thus far in the book, he hasn't mentioned that particular meeting, so I can only assume in his 30 years of research that what occurred in the meeting I was a part of was not an isolated event. One quote in particular that struck me and that describes this meeting well was, "Some congregations have been so riven by unresolved conflicts that they are effectively dysfunctional, 'the perpetrators of generations of corporate pain. With each new pastor the congregation hopes that he or she will be the 'miracle worker' who will make the pain go away" (p. 94).
I know some reviewers of Pink Dandelion's book, The Quakers, stated that they found the book confusing. I did not, but if they thought Dandelion's book was confusing, they may find Hamm's book confusing as well. However, I don't believe the authors themselves are to blame. The Quakers have a complicated history what with all the splits named primarily for the main players: Gurney, Wilbur, Hicks. To compound matters is the task of keeping the particular movements matched up with their modern-day descendants: Liberal, Conservative, Evangelical and the various groups within each of these camps.
In Hamm's book, one will get a detailed outline of the distinctives of each group such as worship practices and doctrinal views that might lend itself it to demystifying an often hard-to-understand group. After reading the book, one might even want to visit a Quaker meeting. In some instances, reading ahead may serve as preparation for what one can expect to experience, particularly in some of the liberal or conservative churches whose worship styles are vastly different from what one may be accustomed to encountering in many Protestant evangelical churches.