Oh, "El Narco", how I wished I liked you more.
I had high hopes for this book after listening to its author, Ioan Grillo, wax eloquently and authoritatively about the Mexican Drug War on the radio some months back. I wanted to understand the senseless - literally, I can't wrap my head around it - killings of over 35,000 people over the past few years by various Mexican drug cartels who went from nearly unknown in the 1980s to some of the most feared gangsters today. In some ways, the book does provide this context: how the center of drug power shifted from Colombia to Mexico; the rampant corruption of Mexican police and government and its role in the drug war; the tactics of these "criminal insurgents", which include snuff videos, drive-by hits, pitched battles on the streets; and even suggestions on how to win the drug war. And, unless you're a member of Seal Team 6, you have to admire Grillo's conjones for interviewing active sicarios (hit men), especially in an environment where journalists have been tortured and murdered by exposing far less information about the cartels.
But, the book is riddled with problems. Its biggest is that there is far too much editorializing. Some of it is innocuous and is merely poor writing, which can be found on nearly every page, like "TV shows don't kill people. Car bombs kill people." (And yes, elsewhere is also a the more generic "guns don't kill people" cliche, but with the attached parenthetical remark "(Although not according to the NRA)"). Far more insidious, though, is when he uses editorial remarks to cut off important debate, especially if the opposition uses methodology he doesn't understand. For example, Grillo ridicules both the Forbes methodology on estimating the net worth of Chapo Guzman, head of the Sinaloa cartel, - "conveniently bang on number with straight zeros"-, DEA's 3/4's estimate of various drug markets - "Or is three-quarters just a standard estimate for a whole lot of drugs?". It would have been better, though, to understand the size of the market and wealth created because later he uses an economic argument for the de-criminalization of drugs in America, but cannot support this argument with strong numbers.
There are other problems. One was that the description of the La Familia cartel was far less nuanced than and contradicted the account in the almost great New Yorker piece. Also, there is this strange undercurrent of hatred of foreign journalists, who Grillo claims come into Mexico and steal Pulitzers from the more deserving Mexican journalists. Some of it is merited, such as when US television stations wanted to embed a reporter in a Mexican anti-narcotics unit, but some of it seems to come from out of nowhere.
I think the takeaway message of the book is that all the cartel people grew up poor, found a market in the US that is price-insensitive to its products (heroin and cocaine), and will go to any lengths to defend and expand that market because of the poor law enforcement. Even if you are a casual drug user, you will feel like an asshole for basically funding this horrible violence so close to us. You will not feel like an asshole, though, if you skip this book and watch the "Dark Knight", which I thought was a better portrayal of the escalation of cartel-like violence.