Murdering the Roses is a murder mystery book by Cindy Bell. It’s six chapters long, and about 131 pages, according to the Amazon storefront page for it. The basic premise is that Vicky and her sister Sarah run the Heavenly Highland Inn, and are looking to host a wedding in a few days. However, an employee ends up being murdered. The book focuses on Vicky and we generally follow her through the book.
I have owned this eBook for a few years; I got it back in 2015, when it was free for a promotional period. And It’s one I’ve always intended to come back to, and read. However, I guess I’ve been putting it off for a while. I randomly chose this book to read because I was thinking that I should be reading more mystery stories.
My first thoughts are that the main characters, Vicky and Sarah, are somewhat judgemental and particularly negative about others. Especially appearances. For example, early on, we get introduced to Bob, who works at the inn. There’s an entire paragraph mocking him for his appearance; complaining that he has scarring from acne and that his tan apparently makes him look dirty, in their opinion. And then Vicky degrades him for having a tattoo, implying that people will think he’s a criminal. In my opinion, I know they’re both trying to imply we ought to think badly of him because of this stuff. But realistically, simply having acne scars, being tanned and having a tattoo doesn’t automatically make you a bad person, and it doesn’t automatically mean you’re a criminal. The author spends multiple paragraphs mocking him for this appearance, and is clearly implying that we should think badly of him because of this, rather than focusing on an actually good reason why to dislike him. Then later in the book, Vicky takes a long time to think about how unintelligent he is, in her opinion. The thing about all this is that a lot of characters have negative things to say about the guy, but we don’t get to hear much about these things from his perspective. And a lot of it is that these other characters are treating him negatively, and not always because he’s done something wrong. It gets to the point where Vicky starts victim shaming him when she finds out he is being stalked and harassed by someone. And this stalker had the help of the chef, Henry, who gave the stalker information on where Bob worked. So Henry is actively encouraging someone to harass Bob, but Sarah takes his side, and the side of the stalker. She and Sarah do not seem like good people, and Henry sounds like a jerk as well. Yet Vicky talks so highly of him, and that his cooking pleases the guests. But… Why is she still supporting him? He did something very wrong and leaked private information about a person to another person. If I were Bob, I’d be pretty mad at him as well.
Even if we forget about that Bob stuff for a moment, Vicky has pretty negative thoughts about a variety of other people. Such as thinking rude things about guests, Timothy as an example. She has a few weird thoughts about him. Like she finds him walking around the inn and considers it to be weird. What’s weird about a guest walking around an inn? It felt like the author was trying to make this behaviour out to be suspicious. But the thing is that a guest walking around a hotel is normal. And lots of these types of places have pieces of art around the walls and building, so he could be checking the place out for historical value. Also, there are weddings and events hosted there regularly, so he could have theoretically been looking at the place, with the intention of renting it for an event in future. But the author just kept pushing this suspicion onto that guest, and it didn’t make sense. So what if a hotel owner doesn’t know things about a guest? That’s normal and it doesn’t make him suspicious based on that fact.
To be blunt, I did not like the book featuring things from Vicky’s perspective. Reading her thoughts about people and stuff going on just felt miserable. And kind of creepy at times. For example, once the body has been found, and the police arrive, Vicky is being interviewed by an officer. Despite it being a very serious scene, where someone she knew has literally been murdered, she starts thinking about how handsome the officer is and the author has Vicky checking him out. It’s just downright creepy in this context. And then several of the remarks she makes clearly implies that she’s more worried about the upcoming wedding taking place, rather than the death of the person. And Sarah as well, she remarks that “We’re going to lose a lot of business over this…” They seem so full of hatred for others, and highly disrespectful.
For the mystery aspects… I was not impressed. Whilst implying that she wants to solve the murder herself, Vicky clearly has no intention of making sure that it gets solved the right way. She automatically assumes that the police will do a bad job, just because there hasn’t been a murderer in the town in a while. So she sets about doing the crime solving herself. She finds that a staff member’s apartment has been broken into, and goes looking into it herself. But the thing is that she’s essentially tampering with evidence. She enters the apartment, without even notifying the police of the break in. And the weird thing is that she automatically assumes that the police will do a bad job of it; she notices that the door had been forced open and assumes that the police overlooked this. What a weird thing for her to assume; it’s not like she was there when they were searching the place, so why does she think they overlooked it? And then the next day, she chooses to search the victim’s apartment herself. But that’s still technically a crime scene. Even if the police have been through it, she should not be entering it. Because the police and other investigators might want to come back to double check things, possibly collect more evidence, etc. So she’s tampering with evidence there as well. Imagine if this case were put to a court of law. A lot of the information they have is due to gossip and assumptions, rather than genuine evidence. And aspects of actual evidence they have would likely be considered inadmissible because of people like Vicky, and family, tampering with the crime scenes. Not to mention the bias of the police officer and Vicky. Any half decent defense attorney would be able to get the case thrown out of court because of a distinct lack of real evidence. And it’s just weird that Vicky and Aunt Ida are being praised by the police for this negative behaviour. And, on a similar note, the author doesn’t present us with the full facts of the case. There are still huge unexplained bits of the mystery, and other stuff that just doesn’t make sense. I feel like the mystery was incomplete, and poorly thought out.
The romance aspects are simply awkward, in my opinion. As mentioned above, Vicky has a crush on the officer, and was checking him out while he was interviewing her. And it gets creepier from there. He is later interviewing her professionally, after she has been assaulted by a mysterious intruder, and he starts talking about a date they had had at some point prior. It’s just inappropriate, in my opinion. And it’s a clear conflict of interest in the investigation; he should not be interviewing someone that he has gone on a date with. Get another officer to do it. It’s a clear conflict of interest in the sense that they haven’t ruled her out as a suspect yet. And the fact that he’s given her information about the investigation is inappropriate as well, for the same reason. The entirety of the romantic stuff between them felt really forced into the book, and felt completely unnatural. Especially the way they were talking about their relationship during professional interviews about the death of someone. How is any of that meant to be romantic?
The actual writing of the scenes and worldbuilding is okay. There are some decent descriptions of what’s going on, and a decent amount of information to add more character to the inn. I appreciate that the author includes snippets of its history. As for characters generally, there was a reasonable amount of them. I appreciated that the author didn’t add too many. The thing is that I didn’t like many of them. I kind of like Aunt Idea. She seems okay. But I felt like the author was trying to stereotype her as being a certain kind of older lady. But she was pretty much the only character I felt okay with. However, she also made some nasty and creepy comments at times, unfortunately.
Overall, I was pretty disappointed with this book. My main problem is that it’s one of the types of mystery books where the author clearly just doesn’t seem to understand anything about evidence, evidence tampering, and what would be admissible in court or not. The mystery portion of the book felt incomplete and the romance aspects were very awkward and creepy. And there was a lot of negativity from the main characters towards other people; such as spending multiple paragraphs mentally degrading Bob for his appearance and intelligence, and stereotyping him because of it all. Despite being a main character, Vicky was somewhat of an antagonist, and contributed pretty negatively towards the book and other characters. I did not like the book. I’m glad I got it free because I would have been annoyed if I’d have paid for it. There’s more books in the series, but I don’t think I’ll read them.