Chuck Swindoll is a name I’ve heard for years. He’s someone my grandfather references and quotes often. With that said, Swindoll’s voice is very reflective of his generation.
At first this merely caught me off guard—specifically the comments revealing his views on small children/parenthood. I was flabbergasted at his comparison of feeding little ones to wandering the desert for 40 years. Maybe it was satire? But it being included in some heavier circumstances, such as grieving death, just didn’t come across well to me. And the number of times he made remarks that showed his almost condescending (perhaps not the right word?) view of young children became almost laughable.
Additionally, contradictory elements continued to give me pause. For example, he discusses in an earlier chapter how he would not be in the delivery room with his wife because of his discomfort; yet, later talks about how God calls us out of our comfort zone and His work is not meant to be comfortable. One can argue, “Kayla, Chuck was talking about relocating for mission work!” My reply is, “Is not leading one’s family and supporting one’s spouse forms of ministry?”
Another example is how he begins the book by stating that biblical fiction, and fiction at large, is not something he does nor likes….yet, later tells readers to use their “imagination” as he paints the scene and dialogue of Moses’ encounter with God at the burning bush….is that not a scene of biblical fiction? But, again, I could sort of shake my head, chuckle, and move on. He does, in between these moments, have really good teachings and ideas presented, often pulling from what Scripture tells us about the life of Moses….and other biblical figures.
And all of this is what some would call “nitpicking.” Perhaps. Reading is subjective. What really “did me in” so to speak, however, is his assertions in a later chapter about anger and “blind rage” being the cause of most criminal acts, including the beating of women and children?! He was drawing parallels to Moses committing murder…but, as he quotes Exodus, Moses checks to ensure there are no witnesses. Does that not negate blind rage? He committed a sin knowing it was wrong after taking pause—there’s still lessons to be learned there. You don’t have to blur motives or the situation to try to venerate the man who would go on to lead the Israelites out of Egypt…but I will restrain myself from going on a large tangent on that point.
In summary, I will not be telling my grandfather my first Swindoll read is also, extremely likely, to be my last.
Chuck Swindoll is clearly a passionate man of God who has helped so, so many people. Many have and, more than likely, will continue to use his studies and words to grow in their personal walks with Christ. I do think, however, Swindoll is not everyone’s “cup of tea” and there are alternate studies and books that would be better for many readers.