Rating: 3.5, rounded down.
A delight of a quick, fast-paced, multi-POV read. I really appreciate how River Bennet was candid in the beginning about how this is not a "retelling" but rather that she was building her own lore that follows the characters we all know. I would recommend this book for someone who is looking for something fast-paced and a divergence from the stories we all know in a mostly positive way. Bennet creates a compelling us-versus-them narrative that has room to evolve and grow if the series continues.
Before I get into a more engaged review of the book, I want to comment Bennet's writing. It was excellent, particularly the scene building and characterizations in the beginning of the novel. Her world is well fleshed out, including the pace of Icarus's quest to join the Legions and the realm of the Oracle.
*WARNING* MILD SPOILERS BELOW REGARDING CHARACTER RELATIONSHIPS AND CHARACTERIZATIONS:
Bennet approaches, particularly Medusa, with care and concern. Her focus on making Medusa her own heroine along with Psyche is genuinely heart warming, as is the friendship that blooms into something more and a brief mild-spice scene. I do think the characterization with Medusa at the beginning of the novel was done particularly well, but some of the charm did die off towards to end of the book. Overall, her character was the most fleshed out of the main four characters.
I believe Hestia was also met with the same concern. Her role as a "spy" for the Allegiance was a perfect way to integrate her into the story. I do wish we could have had more time spent with her trying to uncover the mystery of where Hera is, and perhaps more time spent with Dionysus. Hestia did feel like an after thought when it came to her interactions with the Allegiance. Her relationship with Alec was presented very late into the narrative. While I understand it was a means of her motivation, more details on Alec's end about their relationship would have been appreciated.
I wish we could have had more time spent with the other three main characters: Icarus ("genderbent"), Aphrodite, and Hestia. Icarus felt like her story was rushed and was solely there to fuel a secondary (or even tertiary) plot point for Aphrodite. Icarus's story had so much promise, but she did only seem to be there for Aphrodite's future development. Aphrodite's story, particularly the incest circumstances with Oedipus, felt somewhat unnecessary and anti-feminist/anti-women. Aphrodite's freewheeling love for romance and sex is understanding, given the nature of her goddess realm. However, having her be a victim to her son Oedipus and her trafficking of nymphs, felt incredibly out of place. I wanted to love Aphrodite since this is marketed as a heroine's tale, yet she is anything but. She is a victim, but also a perpetuator of sexual violence.
The last thing I want to touch on is the aspect of this being a sapphic romance. I was so engaged with the prospect of Psyche and Medusa. I think that this was an interesting divergence from the stories we are all familiar with. I wish Bennet would have given us more of their relationship building beyond hand holding and literal soul-searching before they had sex. Medusa, which the novel addresses, has a lot of healing she needs to do. I feel like this first book could have gone without the sex scene between them in order to build their relationship naturally, showing the healing that takes place after sexual assault and years of isolation. Now, addressing the sex scenes with Aphrodite: I understand the intent to have her "final" relationship be sapphic with Icarus. I understand that sex scene as well; it was a casual hook-up at a gala. I wish we could have been given perhaps more queer spice than "normative" heterosexual. Aphrodite has several scenes with Zeus, either just for pleasure or for mutual power, I'm not sure of, including an alluded one with Ares. Aside from the final scene with Icarus, the only sapphic, "explicit" written scene is with Athena. Aphrodite's character falls dangerously to the trope of oversexualized bisexual. While this does fit her character well within the novel, for a book focused on being feminist and rewriting the stories of victims, I'm struggling with the characterization.
Everything in the final act of the book felt incredibly rushed. It took me two re-reads of the last few chapters to finally understand what was happening. More time and care could have been afforded to make sure the pacing and emotion that was demonstrated earlier in the novel continued.