Started to read Moorish Spain by Fletcher that I bought from Amazon.
Literary style is not great, but quite readable.
Some interesting points so far:
-- Conquest of Spain by Arabs was so quick and easy, because:
a) Spain has been already a country accustomed to central government, first by Romans then by Visigoths. Therefore victory in a single battle over Visigoths and death of Visigoth king Roderick were enough to remove organized resistance.
b) Local lords always had great power, and Arab conquerors generally preferred to make a deal with them rather then fight. Under such deal local lord pledged loyalty and provided tax payment, but retained full power in administering local affairs.In such way Arabs could quickly claim the whole peninsula, without actually fighting for each piece of land.
-- From the beginning the invaders included both Arabs and Berbers. When land was distributed, the Arabs got better parts, and Berbers didn't like it. Eventually it led to a lot of local wars between various factions for the second part of 8th century.
-- Roland was one of Charlemagne's nobles, who led expedition of Franks into Spain in order to take advantage of local infighting. The expedition was unsuccessful, and when the force retreated back into France via Basque Country, they were defeated by Basques in Roncesvalle pass in Pyrenees.
-- Around 750 Abbasids replaced Umayyads as caliphs, subsequently transferring capital from Damascus to Baghdad. The only surviving Umayyad escaped to Spain, where he established himself as amir of Cordoba
Continue to read the book, now about 70%.
Again, the style is not fluent, and sometimes there is an impression of superficiality in narrative. I think my main complaint is that analysis of the events part lacks depth. There is some attempt to explain background and reasons for certain major events (such as collapse of Caliphate, rise of Christian kingdoms, the conquest by Almoravids and Almohads), but I don't find it sufficient.
Main outline of the events:
Cordoba khalifate has flourished, but at some point they started to use Berber soldiers from Maghreb to fight the Christians in the North. These were employed not as individuals, but as entire tribes, with their own chiefs as military commanders. These local commanders gained power, and in the beginning of 11th century the khalifate disintegrated into several small statelets (taifas), that constantly fought one another and were unstable politically at home.
In some taifas power was at the hands of Berber military commanders, at others in the hands of local lords. The strongest taifa state was Seville, and it controlled large territory at the height of its power. During this period, Christian kingdoms constantly intervened into internal politics of Muslim taifas, supporting one or other candidate in internal power struggle. Also, the Christians started to collect money tribute from the taifas (Castilian king received tribute even from Granada!).
Almoravids were an Islamist fundamental movement, which took power in Morocco. The Almoravid troops were initially invited into Spain to help fight Christians, but they ended up establishing their own authority over Spain. They were rather successful in their military campaigns against Christians, re-taking some cities (although they failed to capture Toledo).
However, gradually their religious zeal declined, and they got spoiled with good life in Andalusia.