The Western Encounter With The Buddha
Many people in the United States and the West, myself included, have been inspired by and learned a great deal from Buddhism. At one time, information about Buddhism may have been difficult to find, but those now interested have the opportunity to learn to virtually any degree of depth they wish to pursue. In his new book, "From Stone to Flesh: A Short History of the Buddha" (2013), Donald Lopez presents a short history of the different ways Buddhism has been perceived in the West for the past two millennia. A prolific author on Buddhism, Lopez is the Arthur Link Distinguished University Professor of Buddhist and Tibetan Studies at the University of Michigan. His writings combine a thorough understanding of and commitment to his subject with the careful detachment of a scholar.
Lopez begins his story with some early Christian texts, including "Barlaam and Josaphat", a thinly-veiled tale which I have read based on the life of the Buddha. But the continuous account of the West and Buddhism begins with Marco Polo and his account of his visit to Ceylon in about 1292. From the point forward, a series of travelers, adventurers, missionaries, and colonialists visited Buddhist lands and wrote of their impressions. Lopez' history has a clear turning point to modern views of the Buddha. In 1844, Eugene Burnouf, a French scholar adept in many Eastern languages, including Sanskrit, began translating many key Buddhist sutras and published a long Introduction to the History of Indian Buddhism -- the first of what Burnouf planned as a multi-volume project. Burnouf saw Buddhism as a way of life and the Buddha as a teacher of ethics and peace more than the founder of a religion. Burnouf downplayed the miraculous elements in Buddhism and its texts. In short, Lopez argues, Burnouf established the view of Buddhism that has since become prevalent in the West. Burnouf is little read today because his ideas on Buddhism have become almost commonplace. Lopez and another scholar, Katia Buffetrille, published in 2010 a translation of Burnouf's massive Introduction to the "History of Indian Buddhism."
Burnouf's work, together with that of other scholars, comes at the conclusion of Lopez' account. In the earlier chapters of his book, Lopez marks out a substantially different Western portrayal of Buddhism and the Buddha. The story takes several different tracks. Before the 18th Century, knowledge of Buddhism came from travelers to places such as Tibet, Ceylon, Japan, China, Burma. There was difficulty in tracking names, terminology, and practice to the single figure that today is recognized as the Buddha. Those encountering Buddhism were also unclear about whether the Buddha was a god, a mythological creation, or perhaps even a planet. There were thoughts of two Buddhas, one early, one late. Some viewed the Buddha as of African descent. Others conflated him with the war god Thor.
More important was the views of early travelers on the nature of Buddha. The tendency, particularly among the missionaries, was to demonize the Buddha and his followers as victims of superstition and as idol worshipers. These views were based in part on the visitors' own religious preconceptions and on their encounters with Buddhist sites and Buddhists. Few of the travelers became skilled in local languages and fewer still had any access to Buddhist texts. In chapters called "The Idol", "The Myth", and "The Man", Lopez documents encounters with Buddhism prior to the beginning of the 19th Century. The situation began to change almost by chance, through the work of employees of the British East India Company who had the leisure and the curiosity to learn about India. Buddhism originated in India but largely disappeared there and spread throughout Asia.
Lopez discusses the lives and works of many travelers who have been largely forgotten. The book quotes heavily from original sources written in a variety of European languages which makes for slow reading. Much of the material is fascinating. For example, discusses one Ippolito Desideri, a Jesuit who traveled to Tibet. Desideri learned Tibetan and gained familiarity with difficult doctrines of Tibetan Buddhism. In 1717, he wrote a work in Tibetan verse in which he examined and criticized the Buddhist teaching of emptiness.
Lopez offers a nuanced understanding of his sources which bears development. He leaves it to the reader to decide the extent to which Burnouf, the founder of the Western view of Buddhism, is the hero of the story. Bernouf understood the texts well but never traveled outside Europe and never met a Buddhist. His account misses the local, supernatural character of much Buddhism as it had been practiced. Burnouf's predecessors saw the details but not the underlying ideas. They saw Buddhism through the eyes of Christianity and their own supernaturalism while Burnouf saw Buddhism with his perspective of Western secular Enlightenment. His view of Buddhism, quoted extensively in this book, will be familiar to any modern reader who has seriously engaged with the subject. Lopez rightly points out that the modern view suffers from its own enlightenment biases and from attendant historical inaccuracies, albeit different in character from earlier Western understandings of Buddhism.
Lopez offers a challenging, informative history of Buddhism as it has come to the West. The book will be of value to readers with a serious interest in Buddhism.
Robin Friedman