Disclaimer the First: I received a free copy of this book for review purposes through Goodreads.
Disclaimer the Second: I did not finish this book. This is a review of the first 100 pages of Shell Game, because that's how much of it I was able to force myself to get through. For all I know it may become well-written and interesting on page 105, but I have my doubts.
I hate writing negative reviews, mostly because I really want to like the books I read. Occasionally though, there comes a book that I just can't stand, so I just have to try to be fair and honest about why.
The Writing: The writing in Shell Game is incredibly stilted. The adjectives frequently feel piled on and are occasionally baffling. I gave the book to my roommate so she could glance over a few pages and tell me whether I was being too nit-picky. She said it reminded her of her little sister's 5th grade writing assignments where they had to use all the adjectives, so it wasn't just me. Additionally, there are frequent sections of the book that read like a poorly written textbook. The characters' dialogue often comes out as a dry recitation of facts to the point where it's difficult to remember who's speaking because they all sound alike.
The Characters: God are these people boring. They have no personalities. The supposedly tragic things that are happening to them don't really seem all that tragic and with the exception of the villain, they all feel like completely interchangeable shells. And all the dialogue takes the form of whiny-sounding exposition. Seriously, these people are sitting around the room giving each other history lessons all the time, they don't talk like real people, they talk like political soap-boxes.
The Villain: Villains are almost always my favorite characters. I have a special place in my heart for a good villain. Villains show us the parts of ourselves that we try to hide from the world, they are usually the most human characters in a work of fiction. An excellent villain will make you empathize with him, even as you deplore what he is doing. It creates conflict. Conflict is a wonderful thing. You know what makes a terrible villain? Someone who is evil completely for the sake of being evil with no positive traits what-so-ever. If a villain rolls out of bed in the morning, asks "How can I be evil today?", and makes his coffee with fresh water puppies have just been boiled in we have two problems. First, he stops being a threat, because he stops being someone I could encounter on the street tomorrow and becomes a one dimensional caricature. Second, he is boring, because as stated above, he creates no conflict within the reader. The villain in Shell Game gets off on ruining people's finances, and he beats his wife just for funsies. He would have been a significantly more compelling character to read about if he enjoyed ruining everyone else but adored his wife. Alas, he does not, and he is just as boring as the rest of the book.
The Plot: This book bills itself as a thriller. I can conclusively say it is the least thrilling book I have read all week, and for proper context I am counting the Kaplan MPRE study guide. I'm still not entirely sure what the plot is. Now as I mentioned earlier, I did not finish the book. However, if I am 100 pages into a thriller and I don't know what the plot is WE HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM. I assume it's something about these people trying to save their business from the evil people who are taking over the banks. But as I said earlier, these characters are not compelling, and neither are their problems. The main characters are very well-to-do, and it's pretty clear that if they lose all or part of their business they're not exactly going to wind up starving on the streets. The stakes felt pretty unimportant, and I could not bring myself to care what happens to these people.
And ultimately that was the problem with Shell Game, it completely failed to make me care enough about what happened next to keep reading it. The only reason it even got a hundred pages was that I wasn't comfortable reviewing it any earlier in. I cannot recommend it.