Marriage “coach” (I never was quite sure how this title differed from the idea of a marriage “counselor” or “therapist” or than being a sports analogy) Daniel Tocchini has provided here a unique perspective on the essence of a successful marriage, rooted in what he sees as a rather “revolutionary” shift in the predominantly selfish perspective of the dominant cultural metanarrative. In that self-centered, self-aggrandizing story, the goal of “marriage” is to please or better ourselves. In other words, the focus is always on how having a spouse can benefit us, rather than the other way around. This leads, Tocchini explains, to an understanding of the marital relationship as a life-long attempt to “fix” our partner’s problems in order to ensure they can better serve our needs and improve rather than complicate our personal lives. Tocchini labels this the “consumer” view of marriage.
Clearly, such a selfish view of marriage makes for untenable long-term relationships. (I mean, divorce MUST happen if, at any point, my spouse fails in his/her intended “improvement” role.) Tocchini sets out to expose this toxic perspective by making a startling claim: NEITHER spouse “must” change in order to for a marriage to improve. The key to a healthy, successful marriage is, then, the ability for any couple to change their relational perception from “You and Me” to “Us,” where the dyad takes on an almost independent identity. “They shall become one flesh,” I read in a Good Book once (Gen. 2:24). This new “Us” is shrouded in mystery; the work and wonder of marriage is to discover and explore this new reality.
This view makes all the “differences”—personality differences, family-of-origin differences, differences of taste and preference, differences of education and socioeconomic background, etc—avenues to be explored rather than problems to be “overcome.” Those very differences are what comprise the “Us” as distinct from the “You” and the “Me.”
So, what is the mechanism that moves a couple from the patently selfish, subtly adversarial “You and Me” to the more cooperative, adventurous “Us”? The answer is relatively simple: good communication. (You had to see that coming!) The rest of the book, then, proceeds from this theoretical foundation into a kind of “how-to” manual of good communication in a marriage, a sort of series of “coaching lessons.”
For me, what rescues this section from being just a tired “rehash” of every other book about the importance of communication to a healthy marriage is Tocchini’s use of Brueggemann’s concept of “othering,” which he defines as “simply loving your spouse by willing their good.” From this covenantal perspective, “complaining” (which is the chief mode of communication in most marriages) should be perceived as an expression of “yearning” for a deeper relationship. Complaints, then, are NOT threatening to a marriage but are signs pointing the way to a deeper relationship. That path is paved with honesty, forgiveness, and, ultimately, promise, especially the promise that any marriage can be dramatically improved by the discovery of the larger “Us.”
Overall, I found Tocchini’s attempt at “reframing” the nature of marriage and the role of communication within it to be largely helpful and theologically well-grounded (though, I must say, his explanation of the etymological “kinship” between the terms “forgiveness” and “promise” was, frankly, absolute nonsense). I was pleased to see the predominant weight given to a theological construct rather than the latest sociological study of marriage.
That is not to say it was all theoretical. Tocchini presented multiple case studies (they read almost like counseling verbatims) to illustrate these principles at work. I did feel that, in some instances, these reconstructed dialogues were a bit long for the points they were meant to illustrate. However, that feeling could be more the consequence of my unfamiliarity with the genre of the counseling verbatim overall, rather than any particular fault in Tocchini’s use of it.
I suppose one of my biggest fears when reading a book such as this is that, at the end, there will be very little “pay-off” for the reading time I’ve invested…that the grand “conclusion” of the book will prove to be something I already know or something so self-evident that it hardly needed a book to “prove” or “explain” it. However, that was not the case here; I do feel that Tocchini has added to the ongoing conversation, that he has correctly diagnosed an oft-hidden problem that plagues many marriages, and that he has offered fresh insight into ways that ALL couples can act to move past those obstacles.