STRIEBER RETURNS TO THE UFO/VISITORS PHENOMENON, AFTER A BREAK
Louis Whitley Strieber (born 1945) is an American writer originally known for his horror novels (e.g., ‘The Wolfen,’ ‘The Hunger’), but since his 1987 book ‘Communion,’ has become considered as a UFO ‘contactee.’ He continues to write both fiction and nonfiction.
He wrote in the first chapter of this 1995 book, “In December 1985, I found myself swept up in the tide of contact. I had a series of encounters that seemed to me to be almost undeniably real, with strange, fierce, and quite amazing creatures who did not appear to bear any reference to earthly life. When I wrote about these experiences in my 1987 book ‘Communion,’ I was astonished as much as at the public response as I was at the stridency of the rejection and denial that the book met with in the media…. When I withdrew from public life in 1989, I left saying that I would not return until I had something truly new to say. Also in that year, I got strikingly convincing proof that the visitors were real… It provides reasonable assurance that the visitors are real to those who need this to go forward. But it doesn’t simply flatten the case of the skeptics… I said little about the proof when it appeared, because it suggested so many unpredictable consequences… But suddenly, I would no longer deny that somebody was out there, and they did not appear to be human at all.” (Pg. 4)
He continues, “I finally decided to move ahead, but cautiously. It has been six years, but the questions I posed have been adequately addressed under the rigorous conditions that I demanded: nothing counted unless there were multiple witnesses… Given what I have learned under these conditions, I feel that I can say that contact with the visitors is safe, though extremely challenging. I feel that their coming is a call to change. My most accurate speculation about them during my years of public life was probably that they might be what the force of evolution looks like when it applies itself to a conscious mind.” (Pg. 5)
He adds, “With regard to religion, I found my own faith [he is Catholic] and understanding immeasurably enhanced; indeed, contact with the visitors will inevitably lead us to rediscover the richness of all our religions. It will lead to a new foundation, and I cannot imagine that they would challenge or deny any expression of faith. far from it.” (Pg. 7)
He recounts, “I could … hear a certain sound that I identified with the machines of the visitors. This sound had been mentioned, now and again, by me early correspondents, but it [has]… not been described in any publication of which I am aware… It is not the sort of science-fictional humming or whirring described in the popular literature.” (Pg. 17-18)
He recalls, “I had met Dora when she was exploring the ideas of the Gurdjieff Foundation in the early eighties… she struck me immediately with her accurate grasp of the material and her intelligent, skeptical approach… she was no UFO believer, but … Her insights had always been uncannily accurate… In fact, two of the key insights in this book are Dora’s: the one … about the possibility that an actual, physical transformation of the body could be involved, and another about the key to resolving the fear.” (Pg. 42)
He explains, “From the publication or ‘Communion’ in 1987 until September 1994, I received 139,914 letters… Eighty percent of the letters reflect either positive encounters or encounters where the visitors seemed neutral. Sixty percent mention fear. Twenty percent report negative encounters… In all these years, we have received eighty-two pieces of critical mail, including three letters containing threats. Eight out of ten of the critical letters were from people with religious objections to the idea of the visitors.” (Pg. 102-103)
He laments, “In general, the press has responded to this outpouring of witnesses with the same dismissive approach as the scientific community and the government. For the most part, the witnesses are ignored or---if they should dare make public claims---ridiculed. I have experienced much persecution because of my public stance, including orchestrated harassment… Other witnesses report a similar pattern.” (Pg. 111)
He recalls, “I had always believed, tacitly, that the soul was real. But belief is belief; it becomes another and much more urgent matter when something is tangible. At the time, I was reading the Bible to understand the origins of human consciousness, which I feel is recorded in the story of Eden. My interest in physics stemmed from my increasing sense that the visitors might regard what we identify as religion and science as a single discipline.” (Pg. 141-142) Later, he adds, “To take the Bible as literal fact, I’d always assumed, is to deny its real truth, to place the arrogance of belief higher than the subtle message of the divine. I began to see the early narrative of the Bible in a completely new light, as a story that at once expressed the truth of creation in a simple and straightforward way but also resonated with meanings so deep that they seemed to transcend the very words that expressed them. The Word is not a brain-blasting roar of authority, but a creative involving whisper.” (Pg. 155)
He states, “I saw beyond good and evil, thanks to Michael [Talbot, an author] and I saw that my attempt to classify the visitors as one or the other was just an illusion and was the reason they had withdrawn from me. I realized that the visitors viewed good and evil as tools of the soul.” (Pg. 179)
He concludes, “it is also true that the emergence of the visitors is an organized, coherent process that is moving according to a schedule… Until we begin to see them in an accurate manner, they obviously cannot come into meaningful relationship with us… But all this is changing. The fact that they have offered proof of their reality---however gingerly it has been presented---suggests that we are making progress. What concerns me now is that the important elements of the society that are so deeply committed to denial will be unable to adjust when it becomes untenable.” (Pg. 277)
I’m largely a UFO skeptic, but Strieber seems more ‘sincere’ than many others are. At any rate, this book will be of great interest for those studying UFOs, ‘alien abductions,’ etc.