It could get a little too repetitive and spiritual for my taste (religious), but overall a very interesting perspective, that I believe has a lot of ground in truth. The enneagram descriptions are in my opinion very real patterns, that can be observed in human psychology and societal trends. I found the main descriptions to be a little exaggerated. Hence, I’m not sure people can be neatly divided into these types, but I think most people are ”flavours” of the types. The chapter on the ”soul-children” of the types adds more nuance into the enneatypes, basically arguing that the types function as masks to a socially unaccepted, yet instinctive part of ourselves. In contemporary psychological terms, the types can perhaps be understood as coping mechanisms. I found a lot of these ”soul-child” descriptions to be even more accurate than the original type descriptions, as they covey how people can display paradoxical traits (the type & its soul-child, persona & shadow) instead of being caricatures. The book seems rather grounded in Jungian psychology, as a lot of the core concepts seem equivalent to Jungian concepts, such as the shadow, personality, ego, collective unconscious, archetypes?, and sychronicity. I find this book, as well as Jungian psychology to be a very insightful and deep take on the human mind and behaviour. It is more interesting and useful than a lot of contemp. psychology, which largely focuses on quantifiable traits and phenomena.