"At the end of the day, it doesn't matter how ridiculous the get up or how silly the powers. The thing that is eternal about Superman: he will do good even if he's not doing well."- chapter 12
This is about as comprehensive a book about the much-more-varied-than-you-might-expect history of Superman from its creation by Siegel and Shuster in the late 1930's to 2013 (oh, I need to see what Glen Weldon thought about "Man of Steel" now, he must have had all the hot takes imaginable over that gaudy character-shifting monstrosity, but I digress). I think going into a book like this it isn't (or isn't just) about what new things I can learn about the subject, it is how the point of view of the author is infused with the subject matter. Supergods by Grant Morrison leaned more into philosophy, but also had biography. So did the "Marvel Comics the Untold Story" by Howe (I might prefer that just a little more to this, but that is about a whole comic company so there is much more to chew on).
I think the early history from the 1940's to the 1960's was probably the part of the book that grabbed me the most; I don't know how likely I would be to go through those issues (some of those early 1940's comics have aged not even so much due to subject matter but because of the amount of exposition in the bubbles and descriptions), but there was so much of the history that captivated me, about how seriously the public took the character, how it did (and did not) transition along as the first generation/group to read Superman comics aged out of the comics and they had to change as comics had the "code" and the Silver Age came to be, and how so many of the ideas of "retconning" of characters and storylines really took shape much earlier than I thought - not least of which by that one comic from 1961 that altered Superman's origin by Jerry Siegel himself returning to the character he started.
It is hard for Weldon not to get into just listing various titles once we get into the 1990's and 2000's, and that may make the latter part of the book bulked with a bit of a Wikipedia-ing of the subject. But there are still some impressive opinions and takes, not least of which about Superman Returns ("You will believe a man can... flake" is a line I'll remember for a while, re the character just going away for some unknown reason that I concur leaves that film unsatisfying). Much more compelling is his analysis, which runs more or less through the entire book and slips into a running narrative in a sense, of how Superman/Clark Kent's character can be bent, occasionally broken, but it has to come back to the source. I really liked the details about Smallville (a show I've only seen in bits and pieces), the history around the original Reeves Superman TV show, and just how strange things got in the 60's and, oddly enough, less so in the 7o's despite the work of Jack Kirby and the 4th World.
I don't know if I'll remember every detail that I took from this book years or even months from now, but it is consistently engaging and fascinating, especially as Superman represents something not just aspirational in an American sense but how that idea of being good, and feeling sometimes feeling down only because there isn't enough good to do, is something that Americans (and people throughout the world to various extents) know is right but have trouble living up to. That and I do want to check out the John Byrne comics now more than ever. The ones where he had a mullet... less so.