What do you think?
Rate this book


520 pages, Hardcover
First published April 1, 2000
A Book that questions the purportedly unassailable theory of AIT by making extensive use of linguistics. Well researched and exhaustive work on the fundamentals of the Aryan Debate.
One of the chief theory advanced is the chronology of the Rigveda i.e. how the ten mandalas line up, starting from the most ancient to the latest by examining the timeline of the composers, kings, and other contemporaries mentioned in the text and scrutinizing the development of the Sanskrit language as it progressed through the ages. Using this chronology and comparative study of Avesta along with a short investigation into other Indo-European languages, we arrive at the conclusion that the migration was from the East to the West instead of the generally claimed West-to-East one. Important point to heed here is this east-to-west movement is chiefly of the language. It's not the question of purity or superiority of any group of people whatsoever. Or any such nonsense of this category.
The question of the identity of the 'Aryans' is succinctly dealt with by locating them as the Bharata sub-tribe of the tribe Purus who lived in the vicinity of several other tribes such as Anus, Druhyus, Ikshvaku, Yadu, and Turvasa who they had constant interaction with: some of them friendly, others hostile.
The author also calls out the tendency among the AIT proponents to misinterpret the mythological themes to suit their agenda or getting into circular reasoning or the habit of putting anyone who challenges them into one-size-fits-all robe of saffron.
It is for the reader to decide whether the claims made by the author makes sense or not. However, the book undoubtedly is of high scholarly value and must be read by the students of Indian History at least once.