Loud and Clear

Beat Boyz #3

by Lupa Garneau

Adrian is happy with his life. Although he lost his hearing at a young age, he has learned to look on the bright side. He's got a good job, a place to live and food in his belly. What's to complain about?

Casper had to grow up overnight after his mother died, leaving a thirteen year old girl in the hands of a drunk and abusive father. Trying to hold down two jobs and fight for custody of his sister, he's been jaded by the experience and feels if he's going no where in his life.

That changes when he meets his co-worker, Adrian, a vibrant, happy guy with an infectious smile. Not to mention, he's hot to boot. Adrian shows him that it's okay to take some time out for himself and to enjoy what you've been given in life, but as things heat up with the custody battle, he may be forced to chose between his sister or Adrian.

Genres: Theology, Christian, Philosophy, Nonfiction

34 pages, Kindle Edition

First published January 1, 1960

About the author

Lupa Garneau is a Romance and Erotic Fiction author. She lives in Chi-town, home of the best music scene on the planet.

Reviews

[Josiah Richardson · Rating 3 out of 5]

A short conversion story from Van Til as well as a response to the assertion that Christian's only believe in Christianity because of the area they were born in and the family they were raised in; that they would be Buddhists if they were born in China or India with a family that raised them to be Buddhists. Decent response, but a lot of tangents throughout.

[Jay · Rating 5 out of 5]

Short and Sweet

Van Til is one of my heroes. His basic argument is that everyone believes in God in some sense. And the proof is that everyone believes in things that, at bottom, are only justified by belief in God.

I’d be very curious what my non-Christian family and friends thought of this.

[João Uliana · Rating 4 out of 5]

Excelente aplicação do pressuposicionalismo vantiliano. De maneira breve o autor aplica sua apologética num suposto diálogo com um não cristão.

[Tom Carpenter]

Very important.

[Ryan Watkins · Rating 4 out of 5]

First read this back in 2019. Reread now in 2023. A nice introduction to Van Til's apologetic methodology. I think he's easier to read than many would admit. I especially appreciated his humor.

[Logan · Rating 4 out of 5]

A very personal testimony. Nothing spectacular but Van Til doesn't back down from his position that we are all influenced and biased but only his worldview gives unity and makes God the center rather than self.

[Jonathan Celaya · Rating 4 out of 5]

Great short read. Van Til is famous for his "presuppositional" approach to apologetics. Those not familiar with Van Til and the presuppositional method will find a clear exposition of it here. I would recommend this to all!

[Peter Whyte · Rating 5 out of 5]

Clear, thought-provoking, challenging and persuasive. Essential reading for anyone who is unsure if God exists. And highly recommended for every Christian as a model for how to present the gospel forthrightly and without compromise, yet respectfully.

[Jordy Andrade · Rating 5 out of 5]

Para Cornelius Van Til, filósofo e teólogo holandês radicado nos Estados Unidos, considerando sua abordagem apologética pressuposicional, argumentar acerca da existência de Deus sem conceber o condicionamento divino em todas as coisas nos distaria de qualquer tipo de significado, de maneira que não poderíamos crer logicamente em mais nada. Seria, então, semelhante a argumentar sobre o ar. Nas palavras do autor: "você pode afirmar que o ar existe ou que não existe, contudo, enquanto debatemos, estamos ambos, todo tempo, respirando". Logo, Deus é "o posicionador onde repousam as armas que devem atirar nele, mesmo afim de pô-lo fora de existência".

Esse pequeno livro (de fato, apenas em tamanho) parte biográfico, parte apologético é, acima de tudo, o testemunho de uma vida regenerada. Testemunho esse que, como advoga Van Til, estaria despido de significado, não fosse pela verdade objetiva e pelos fatos objetivos que ele pressupõe. Já afirma o autor, "testemunho que não seja um argumento também não é testemunho, de mesmo modo, um argumento que não seja testemunho, também não configura argumento".

[Emanuel Queiroz · Rating 5 out of 5]

A apologética de Van Til traça uma categoria argumentativa não para diluir a teologia bíblica na sabedoria humana, mas para deslocar o incrédulo da ignorância sobre a própria incredulidade e expressar a inevitável glória de Deus como SENHOR Soberano sobre tudo, até mesmo a consciência dos ímpios que, por mais pervertida e destruída que seja, é incapaz de anular a finalidade para a qual foi criada pelo SENHOR: tornar todos os homens inescusáveis diante do Seu trono.

Leitura indispensável e uma ferramenta excelente de convite à apologética pressuposicional.

[Otávio Mayrink · Rating 2 out of 5]

Bastante superficial - até pra um texto introdutório. O autor gastou a maior parte do tempo afirmando as próprias visões, sem desenvolver o "why" - muito fraco na argumentação (que aparentemente seria o objetivo do livro). Em alguns momentos chega a ser infantil (não me refiro às referências que ele faz à sua infância e juventude, mas como se posiciona no debate, sua maturidade). Esse é aquele tipo de texto q vc lê o primeiro parágrafo e já sabe tudo oq ele vai escrever. Também não me agradou o tom presunçoso do autor - especialmente na segunda metade do livro.

[Laurent Dv · Rating 5 out of 5]

Incredible relevant (firstly for unbelievers) and intelligible (surprinsinly coming from Van Til). Definitively, the first and chief book of Van Til to read ! One will find : presuppositional apologetics, critics of traditional apologetics, of barthism and fideism, transcendantal proof for God, insights on psychology, Van Til's story, clear illustrations of difficult concepts

[Michael · Rating 5 out of 5]

Extremely interesting in that it raises more questions than it answers. Van Til’s goal is not to convince the unbeliever of belief in God, but to show that said unbeliever’s rationale for unbelief is equally as “faithful” as the believer’s, if not more so. An excellent introduction Van Til in that it whets the appetite for more.

[Collin Smith · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is an extremely short and endearing introduction to presuppositional apologetics.

Edit: I guess the entry for this book got changed to an erotic novel.. just adding this note in case something happens to this version as I see it’s still tagged as a part of that series. This is an apologetics book!

[Marcio Neves · Rating 5 out of 5]

Um livreto curto e objetivo, sem deixar de ser técnico. Gostei da construção do dialogo entre Cornelius Van Til e incrédulo fictício, além do artigo de Scott K. Oliphint sobre a Apologética Pressupocionalista.

[Adam T. Calvert · Rating 4 out of 5]

A terrific example of presuppositional apologetics at work! A short read, but well worth it.

[Jeremy Counts · Rating 4 out of 5]

Excellent short read on the truth of the Christian faith.

[Linn · Rating 5 out of 5]

"Toda abordagem apologética incapaz de comportar a autoridade da revelação de Deus é apenas vaidade, e correr atrás do vento..."

[Christopher David · Rating 5 out of 5]

A short, beautiful essay introducing the Christian faith in an engaging dialogue form.

[Jeff · Rating 4 out of 5]

Good.

[Miles Foltermann · Rating 4 out of 5]

Short but remarkably powerful.

[Andrew S. · Rating 3 out of 5]

Very short length, yet Van Til still makes some great points about the dangerous assumptions far too many atheists make.

[Kevin · Rating 5 out of 5]

Quintessential VanTil

This short work grants you a hearing of the wit and mind of Van Til along with his love for the Lord, the Gospel and being a witness for Christ. This is a great introduction to his thought and style.

[Samuel Kassing · Rating 3 out of 5]

Epistemology is never neutral in our world.

[Armando Portillo · Rating 5 out of 5]

I love this book

Here is a man who should be known more than he is. A wisdom like this is rarely found in theologeons.

[Melissa]

History philosophy

[Matthew Rawlings · Rating 5 out of 5]

This pamphlet can be easily read in one sitting and, while dated, is the best example of presuppositional apologetics "in action" that I have ever read.

[Michael Martinez · Rating 3 out of 5]

Neutrality does not exist when it comes to thinking, and anyone who is not with God, is against God. Some are born into a context that conditions them to believe in God, and others are born into a context that conditions them to disbelieve in God, there is no neutral conditioning when it comes to this question of God existing or not existing, it is always one or the other. Cornelius essentially argues the presuppositionalist position, one which acknowledges that no amount of evidence will somehow convince an Atheist who already presupposes a system that discounts any evidence in support of God existing. For instance, proving miracles to an atheist may not work, since they can always just move the goalpost and say that said miracles are simply new aspects of their naturalist worldview, and ergo not even miracles. Cornelius is squarely within the Calvinist school, and ergo concludes that he cannot convince anyone that God exists, but merely that he can explain why he exists, and it is up to God to move someone into belief. I think there is much worth in presuppositionalist apologetics, but disagree squarely with Van Til in that I do not believe that God picks and chooses who he wants to have belief in him or not, but rather that he wants everyone to believe in him, and does in fact give sufficient grace for that, but that some just choose to reject him nonetheless. Van Til rightfully points out that many apologetic points only make sense under certain presuppositions, and he contends that only the presupposition of God can justify anything to begin with, and that without God, one cannot give a coherent account of anything. All in all, good work.

[Jacob O'connor · Rating 4 out of 5]

I love this guy.  

I was introduced to Cornelius Van Til through the works of one of his students, John Frame.  Van Til is famous for his "presuppositional" approach to apologetics.  Honestly, I don't know why this approach hasn't caught on.  I find it to be the most persuasive of all methods. 

From it come the transcendental arguments for the existence of God.  Van Til puts it like this, “God is like the emplacement on which must stand the very guns that are supposed to shoot Him out of existence”.  That pretty well it sums up. 

Want to argue that God doesn’t exist?  You have to use logic and reason.  One has to presuppose God in order for logic and reason to even work. 

Want to complain about evil? One has to presuppose God in order for evil to make sense.

Truly, the moment one commits to any worldview outside of God’s, he has become self-contradictory.  As soon as you suggest that God may not exist, you sacrifice all epistemic warrant for any kind of belief at all.  For instance, if my mind evolved to exist through chance, why in the world should I trust what it tells me? 

Maybe the reason this has not been adopted by more apologist is that it is inherently smug.  I can appreciate that

[Chris Comis · Rating 3 out of 5]

Great little book on VT's upbringing and growth in the faith, from childhood to adult. He talks a lot about his family's influence on him in bringing him up in the fear and instruction of the Lord. He then uses this backdrop to tell his unbelieving readers that they too were brought up in an antithetical kind of fear and instruction. This is a highly accessible book, and that says a lot, considering the fact that lots of people have expressed consternation over the years at trying to read and understand Van Til.