The author very clearly states their intention right from the beginning of this book; that is, to help the reader to find ways of integrating scholarly texts on historical witchcraft into a practical, working framework. I think in some ways this is accomplished very elegantly and on a few occasions I feel the author ignores the historical context and overlays the sources with a type of personal 'pagan' ideology, which leads to a debased historicity.
I really enjoyed some chapters and felt really put off by other parts. The book goes into quite some depth regarding the need for us moderns to appreciate a world before electricity, highlighting how the lack of electricity allowed people more liminal time and how this would've fostered a context in which the Otherworld was better able to be experienced. Also spoken about is how the boundary between the inner world and the outer world has become much more delineated and how, back then, the idea of "without substance" was unknown to the psyche and all phenomena was physical. I think this is a very valid and important context in which to approach the Craft, thus discouraging the somewhat anti-physical "New Age" mind-set. I also enjoyed the idea that imagination can lead to vision and how narratives can act as a kind of springboard from which to experience the Otherworld. Again, this ties into the idea of a lack of delineation between the inner, outer and Otherworld.
I found attempting to read the book from an academic perspective to be disappointing and somewhat frustrating. From this perspective it lacks depth, objectivity and the actual editing is quite poor too. The chapters are very short and I was frequently left wanting more or some kind of objective conclusion, making it seem a bit bitty in places. The author is pretty anti-Christian and sometimes this lead to interesting thoughts, whilst at other times it caused the narrative to drift off into Christian-bashing and the history and context-oriented perspective was lost. This is exemplified when the author notes that Necromancy as it is presented in Grimoires suffers from being full of Christian material, which may not work ideologically for the Witch, so the author attempts to bring out the best of the Grimoire tradition into the authors own 'witchcraft context' by adapting the rite. This contradicts the best parts of the book, parts that express the importance of entering into the mind-set of the period.
Despite this, the idea that Witchcraft is a myth and a story that we must embrace and claim is very attractive. The idea that the Myth of Witchcraft is a conduit for Otherness is a profound one and this is where the book has its value; it is poetic and pulsates with a "witchy" feel, a feeling that will inspire the reader to go off in search for the world of Other, to dwell in the twilight and to Know that which fuels the Myth.