Juche as a concept intrigues me because it is one solely of autonomy and sustainability. It reminds of Nyerere’s Ujamaa and its own sustainability. Both Sung and Nyerere emphasized this need to create a self-sustaining nation that can survive famine, war, etc. Sung’s belief that only economic independence can truly make political independence is correct. Without the meddling of foreign nations, how could a liberated one be genuinely free when their money is tied to neocolonialist wills. How can Cuba be truly free with an illegal embargo against its country? Or how could Iran have been free if they are unable to nationalize their oil production? A nation which is dependent on another economic ally is bound to be politically subordinate.
In “For the Development of the Non-Aligned Movement,” we see Kim Il Sung state that we must abolish nuclear weapons to abolish the threat of global devastation. Sung equates that imperialist forces were/are amassing large arsenals to deter revolutionary and independent movements, which is just correct. I find it interesting in the case of DPRK and China that their building of nuclear arsenals was not in an imperialist manner to control but rather deter. It’s why Iran, with a potential of nuclear capabilities and alignment with other BRICS nations with nuclear arsenals, allows them the to protect their borders from encroachment from imperialist forces. Do I believe in the full abolition of nuclear weapons? Of course. But the monopoly of violence cannot be just maintained by the capitalist nations or everyone will bend the knee to oppression.
Sung’s emphasis on a self-reliant state requires political independence, military self-reliance, and stressed equality of each nation to have self-determination. I think distortions of Juche by his sons has done innumerable damage to the socialist project in DPRK. Not to say it is a failure, but I believe it has left its democratic origins for a more nationalist interpretation. Vulgar Marxists tend to have a simplistic view that socialist societies simply cannot exploit workers or deny democratic rights. This ignores Marx’s analysis that the whole economic, social, and ideological conditions of a society mutually affect each other and that we wage some “good vs evil” form of moral battle.
I pray to see a unified, democratic, and socialist Korea in our lifetime.