This one came at me from an odd place; a local health care clinic has an exchange library in the space between two sets of doors that access the facility. I mention this only to point out that I'd never heard of this author or her Magdalene la Batard series and that it might be hard to find. Published in 1999, I discovered that this first book in the series is unavailable at my local library (all four branches),nor are any other books in the series or anything else by the author. In point of fact, the book that I borrowed from the exchange library was the third novel in the series, entitled Bone of Contention and the draw for me was a painting on the cover that showed characters in their medieval (12th century) costumes and a quick glance/read at the opening chapter. I immediately decided that I wanted to start at the beginning and went in search of the debut novel, A Mortal Bane. I purchased it from a second hand book store ($5, free shipping) and launched into it. Now I have to look for the second book in the series (A Personal Devil) and wait to read the third one.
The author (Roberta Gellis) has a masters degree in medieval literature and another in (?) biochemistry. The first certainly shows in A Mortal Bane and what little I read in the opening paragraphs of a Bone of Contention. This is both good news and bad news. There is a central element of political intrigue in the first book and it embraces competition for the English throne, between Maud and Stephen. Who is the rightful King or Queen? I have to admit that my medieval history is a little rusty and some of the elements of the tale that relate to this era specifically are a little hard to grasp without a Wikipedia search for the British monarchy, circa 1139. Even then, the ins and outs of the Maud vs. Stephen story are a little difficult to follow. And it's important to the story and how it relates to Pope Innocent II. A messenger from him has been sent to Southwark, outside of London, with a missive related to all of this. This puts both messenger and message in the vicinity of the Old Priory Guesthouse, now a whorehouse run by Magdalene la Batarde.
I found myself kind of breezing over some of the more specific plots and counterplots circling around the struggle for the British crown, while the narrow story engaging Magdalene and the whores in her charge drew much more of my focus. It's a well-told tale with engaging characters and a very upfront and practical look at some of the whys and wherefores of prostitution, which was viewed at this highly religious time as much more moralistically scandalous, while at the same time, easier to understand for everyone who wasn't a priest or some other representative of the Church.
There is a death, early on, and much of the novel is taken up with Magdalene la Batarde's attempt to expose the killer, because members of a nearby Church are adamant in their belief that a member of this disgraceful gathering of whores is responsible. It is in la Batarde's best interest to dispel this notion quickly, because a) she or one of her whores might just get hanged by some Church tribunal for something they didn't do and b) it's basically just bad for her business.
She is eventually joined in her quest for a killer by the most trusted knight of the nearby Bishop of Winchester, Sir Bellamy of Itchen, who's just itchin' (sorry, couldn't resist) to canoodle with the Madam of the whorehouse, but is constrained by the impropriety of sleeping with a suspect and by his own desire to be with her without having to pay her. He's not just being cheap, he's a bit smitten, as is the object of his desire, Madame la Batarde. I can see this pair moving on through numerous sequels wrestling with this issue, further complicated by aspects of Madame la Batarde that she needs to resolve. There's a bit of 'damned if they do, damned if they don't' side of it, with Itchen reluctant, but willing to pay, while la Batarde is concerned that to sleep with him without pay would be indicative of a special favor granted to a murder suspect. There's more to it, but it slips into 'spoiler' territory, best encountered by a reader.
None the less, a compelling narrative that doesn't linger, or even really detail any intimate scenes in the whorehouse. Madame la Batarde is running a business. Customers come and go, somewhat literally, and she is fierce in her dedication and desire to protect the women in her charge. Customers come by appointment sometimes and if engaged at a mealtime, are generally fed, as are the women. They're treated well by their Madame, who also assures that the customers do not take liberties with these women that involve violence or exploitation outside the confines of the Priory Guesthouse. The whole whorehouse angle of the tale is very matter-of-fact. Balanced against the self-righteousness of a few church officials who think the very idea of the place is scandalous and should be stopped, it creates a conflict dynamic that, along with the author's background in medieval literature, paints what it appears to be a very accurate picture of what's come to be known as the world's oldest profession at the time.
And then, there's the mystery, which, after engaging with just the idea of a whorehouse and its inhabitants, takes center stage. Sir Bellamy of Itchen appears to have a passing knowledge of forensics, to include such matters as the color of blood (changing over time, after a death), the mechanics of rigor mortis and some common sense (knowing, for example, that the killer had to be of a certain height and that based on the wound and no signs of a struggle, the killer was known by the victim).
And so it goes, merrily forward to its conclusion. It's a good ride. You might want to familiarize yourself with some of the political intrigue of the mid-12th century era. It'll help you to understand some of the back and forth banter about who wants whose job, what the implications of having this or that archbishop might be and of course, the somewhat central intrigue of who's going to emerge as the rightful heir to the throne of England. It won't take long; delving too deeply is unnecessary, because the story does manage to stand on its own, even if you don't do the research.