Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage

by Laurajane Smith

This controversial book is a survey of how relationships between indigenous peoples and the archaeological establishment have got into difficulty, and a crucial pointer to how to move forward from this point. With lucid appraisals of key debates such as NAGPRA, Kennewick and the repatriation of Tasmanian artefacts, Laurajane Smith dissects the nature and consequences of this clash of cultures. Smith explores how indigenous communities in the USA and Australia have confronted the pre-eminence of archaeological theory and discourse in the way the material remains of their past are cared for and controlled, and how this has challenged traditional archaeological thought and practice. Essential reading for all those concerned with developing a just and equal dialogue between the two parties, and the role of archaeology in the research and management of their heritage.

272 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2004

Reviews

[Sam Orndorff · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book compares the issues relating to Indigenous claims to “the past” and what artifacts or sites mean for different groups. Smith provides interesting context about how archeological expertise became integrated into governance for the public good over the 19-20th century. In essence, archeologists are now crucial parts of policy dealing with heritage objects like skeletal remains. This authority exercised by academia suppresses Indigenous claims to the past, due to the seemingly objective way that law works. Smith demonstrates how the settler colonial state or private citizens appropriate Native American archeological artifacts as the property of all (i.e. NOT of Native American tribes themselves).

I would have liked more environmental and geographical context, but otherwise this text is excellent.