As a collection of calming activities, this short book can be informative. It is less so as a presentation on ‘intuition.’
The book presents intuition as ‘simply a deep knowing or feeling that compels spontaneous action’ (28%) Intuition doesn’t come from, or through, the mind, although intuition may use mental constructs like words. It arises because human ‘nervous systems are electrical systems which are plugged directly into the electrical systems of the universe (the field). Intuition spontaneously arises within humans’ (52%)
There is no evidence or reason given for believing that humans are coupled up to a ‘field’ which feeds them information. The book just assumes it, and asserts it.
Generally intuition can be viewed in two ways. It can be taken as an alternative form of perception, like ESP (Extra sensory perception), which is alleged to acquire information which the normal senses cannot acquire (eg mind reading, etc).
The other model of intuition views it as a type of subconscious reasoning. It is not a way of acquiring information, but it is a way of processing information which has been acquired through the normal senses, to reach new conclusions.
This book seems to view intuition as a source of information, and it recommends ‘de-cluttering’ activities to free up the mind, so that people can access this unique source of information.
But there is no discussion of the two different models of intuition, and there is no argued case for preferring the one model of intuition to the other. The book just assumes that one particular model is ‘obviously’ correct.
The book also makes assumptions about the accuracy and reliability of ‘intuition.’ It insists that ‘No harm can come from following your intuition, because it is leading you to where no harm can come’(35%). This is circular (fallacious) reasoning. Intuition is safe because it is… safe.
But is intuition really a safe and accurate source of information? People generally rely upon perception, but optical illusions show that even that can let people down. So what reason have we got for treating intuition as a kind of infallible source of information. The book gives no reason, other than asserting that it is so.
Ultimately, if intuition leads you astray then the book insists that it is your fault for not listening to it properly (78%). But how does the book know that to be true? Perhaps intuition is like perception, and can err? If so isn’t the book dangerous and irresponsible to recommend that people blindly trust intuition ?
Overall, this book is an expression of the author’s opinions about intuition, but it presents no reasons for believing them to be true. It doesn’t discuss alternative views and it leaves the reader potentially blindly trusting an intuition which it gives no justification for doing.