“Christianity at any given time is strong or weak depending on her concept of God (pg. 41).”
“We try to promote religion, forgetting that it rests upon the character of God. If I have a low concept of God, my religion can only be cheap, watery affair. But if my concept of God is worthy of God then it can be noble and dignified; it can be reverent, profound, beautiful. This is what I want to see once more…Pray that way, won’t you? (pg. 195)”
Things I enjoyed:
- Tozer obviously was passionate about pushing the Church to return their gaze and their efforts toward knowing God and being defined and transformed in Him. He focused on attributes of God that aren’t exhaustive, but seem to be elected because they’re possibly the ones most avoided or mishandled in his perspective, as well as the ones that have weight in understanding the other attributes of God (example: in chapter 1 - All that God is, He is without bounds or limits. In chapter 3 - If God is good, He is infinitely good).
- A major takeaway of mine is to be careful in defining or relating God to anything and to remind myself He is completely other. He isn’t better than the next person at love, goodness, excellence, etc, He IS love, good, perfect, etc. He is never NOT love, good, perfect, etc.
- I also enjoyed the format of the book with the study guide at the end, as it helped clear up some confusing parts as well as summarized thoughts from the chapter.
- I think I gained way more from reading this in a group and discussing it together than if I read it on my own. This is in part because I’m an external processor, but also helped me have takeaways despite some of the things mentioned below.
Things I didn’t like:
- This book was written in the 1950’s, and there are several places that it feels pretty dated or insensitive (example: Abraham Lincoln regarded as a good but less than perfect man after telling a story of him chasing his wife across the lawn saying she didn’t obey??? Ummm what?).
- Although I am not disagreeing with his assessment that we can much improve our reverence toward God, he tends to speak in extremes that I don’t agree with. Examples: 1) “The Bible knew nothing about the “laws of nature” (pg. 44). (I have had many conversations with friends that these “laws” actually do much to glorify God/deepen our awe at his intricate work), 2) “You can join almost any church now. I’ve heard recently of a church where at the closing hymn they open the doors and anybody can join. A gangster can join. I say, ‘Never, never, never!’ If they can’t get to into heaven, they ought not get into our churches! (pg. 172)” (Ummm, EXCUSE ME?! This is within a chapter that he says our “holiness” is gray compared to God’s white. Isn’t the church a place to welcome anyone who wants to seek God, and shouldn’t we be a people quick to admit none of us are more or less in need of CHRIST’S holiness than the next person? The chapter was generally in agreement with me here, but this comment was confusingly and disturbingly off the mark).
- In his passion (hopefully) Tozer often came across as pretty condescending, and with the above problem of talking on extremes, would almost talk as if nothing is being done to the glory of God today/when he wrote the book. Again, this contradicts his overall message that God is unlimited and so I don’t think we can ever claim that He is not working in a place.
-Because of some of the above points, I’m not sure I would recommend this book to be read with any groups where you weren’t 100% sure there would be transparent discussion and room to disagree with Tozer, especially if there’s anyone who is in a precarious place in their faith.
- Because it was a sermon transcript (and not originally a book), it got to be pretty repetitive at several points.
Overall, I’m glad I read this. There are things I’ll takeaway, and things I disagreed with that helped me understand better what I do agree with.