What do you think?
Rate this book


288 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1986
1. Mrs. Brown constantly misquotes the Bible. Like one person already said: "She quotes Leviticus 26:6, 22. Verse 6 in the King James Version uses the words "evil beasts," while verse 22 of the same Version has "wild beasts." She then falsely assumes that there is a distinction between the two and asserts that "there are numerous references to wild beasts belonging to the Lord, but never to evil beasts belonging to Him" (p. 225). From this she argues that "wer beasts" are these "evil beasts" produced by demons that make humans take on "animal-like" shapes. Problem. First, the KJV does not accurately represent the original Hebrew of the Leviticus passages she quotes. All she had to do was check other versions, like the Amplified Bible, to see this. Second, she assumes, based on a faulty English version, that there is a distinction - when there isn't one in the Hebrew." Both words are the same, which means her theory does not hold.
2. Mrs. Brown even contradicts herself. Elaine (the former "satanic priestess") says that the Pope is in the upper ranks of a major occult network involving satanists, sorcerers, and witches. "We [i.e. the satanists] worked closely both with the Catholics -- especially the Jesuits -- and the high-ranking Masons." But then she also says nobody serving the devil can say that "Jesus is Lord" or that they serve Him. This is how she tests the golden-haired angel who appeared to her: "I knew no demon would make such a declaration, Satan would tear him to shreds on the spot if he did." So then we have a problem when the Catholic (and Jesuit) Pope Francis declares over and over that Jesus is Lord, as anyone doing a simple Youtube search can see. The only conclusion is that Elaine's story is false.
There are many more fallacies, but these two will suffice to show that the book is nonsense.