Dividing the sixth chapter of Romans into two large sections based on the two rhetorical questions (“Should we just keep on sinning so that God can provide yet more grace?” and “Should we keep on sinning since we have been set free from the Law?”), Romans: The New Man: Exposition of Chapter 6 is a fascinating set of sermons about the state and behavior of the Christian believer. For me, 20th century physician turned pastor, David Martyn Lloyd-Jones, is remarkably thorough in his exposition and generally correct. However, I find myself occasionally offended when he goes beyond his exposition to take unnecessarily bifurcated stances.
I find myself offended at Lloyd-Jones taking exception to the idea of the church as a hospital for sinners rather than a barracks for holy warriors (p. 174). Since a “healing” and “therapeutic encouragement” is part of the church’s responsibility as a covenant fellowship, one would think that the church would be more like a field hospital (a Mobile Army Surgical Hospital?) dealing with the wounded and assisting in rehabilitation before facing the spiritual conflict once more. But, no! Lloyd-Jones says it has to be one or the other? I am also not quite sure that Lloyd-Jones, although admitting to the mystery involved, doesn’t interpret Jesus’ quotation of Psalm 22:1 on the cross rather too much without considering the fullness of God’s plan (p. 109). These may be issues of stress and nuance, but I find them off-putting enough that I cannot give a superior recommendation of this book to every potential reader.
Nonetheless, there is much more in this volume to commend it than in the previous books that I’ve read in the series. One appreciates his emphasis on the passive aspect of the Christian’s new state in Romans 6:3 (p. 39), as well as his emphasis on “general blessings” upon saved and unsaved versus the full potentiality of “all” the blessings of God in Romans 6:11 (p. 135). I particularly liked his description of the “inconsistency” of (not the non-existence of) sin in the Christian life. “Why then do I sin? Because sin is in my members, because this ‘body of sin’ remains. But I am sharing in a salvation that will even rid me of that. I realize that I am behaving in an inconsistent manner—inconsistent because I am a Christian, not because it is doubtful whether I am a Christian.” (p. 84) I also appreciated his emphasis on how Paul personified sin to emphasize the ongoing struggle of the believer (p. 168, and elsewhere).
Perhaps, the most valuable contribution in this volume is Lloyd-Jones’ exposure of problematic ideas of sanctification. On pages 155-156, he notes that the context of an exhortation not to surrender to sin indicates that sanctification is not something merely to be accepted. It takes work. Sanctification is not something that is a sudden experience with no further relevance because, as long as sin is in the mortal body (and it will always be so until we receive that transformation described in 1 Corinthians 15 upon Christ’s return), we will not have a deliverance once and for all until that point (p. 156). Further, sanctification is not merely a matter of letting go and letting God, because Romans 6 is exhorting believers to act, not surrender (p. 156). Finally, since the exhortation is addressed to the believers’ wills, “…any teaching concerning sanctification or holiness which tells us that we really have nothing to do, and that the main call to us is to stop trying to do anything in the matter of our sanctification, is obviously a contradiction of this.” (p. 164)
While this may not seem significant to everyone, Lloyd-Jones offers a very interesting translation of “form of doctrine” in Romans 6:17 as “pattern of doctrine.” (p. 212) This is nice because he later summarizes the ascending steps of the believer’s relationship with God as: a) obedience, b) doctrinal assurance (“pattern of doctrine”), c) righteousness, and d) fellowship with God (pp. 292-293). The progression is not one of “earning” salvation, but building upon it.
Finally, I enjoyed his summary of the chapter as dealing with three (3) issues: 1) masters, 2) terms, and 3) ends (p. 310). Those three areas explain what the Apostle Paul was making clear in Romans 6. In terms of fodder for thought and usefulness for preaching and teaching, I think Romans 6 was significantly more profound than previous books in the series.