What I got most out of this book was the authors humility. He questions himself, is afraid, full of doubts and anxiety. But his central point is that through self reflection, discipline, and most important faith in God, one can overcome all tribulations.
Being irreligious myself I of course thought there was an over reliance upon religious arguments, but only a slight one; if anything I was impressed by the length and breadth of MLK’s arguments, and especially by his deep knowledge of non-religious philosophy. At many points he brings up figures like Hegel, Heidegger, Sartre, Kierkegaard and more, comparing them to his model of belief. What emerges is a soberly rational approach that accepts the limits of faith, that encourages rational reflection and rejects blind superstition. While the point is always that man cannot have a fulfilling and moral life without Christianity, religion is not the be-all and end-all, and various forms of knowledge at which Christianity fails at are praised.
I especially liked, “Their respective worlds are different and their methods are dissimilar. Science investigates; religion interprets. Science gives man knowledge which is power; religion gives man wisdom which is control… The two are not rivals. They are complementary.”
While the main theme of this book is of course the struggles of the civil rights movement, there is also a lot of emphasis put on the growing wealth and material prosperity of the United States, which incorporated the first echoes of the growing concerns of wealth inequality and social disruption. Much of the sermons are concerned with developing the capacity to create inner strength, and in this sense it really appealed to the moral philosopher in me. As mentioned, this heavily relied upon religion, but not in a way that felt overtly biased: in other words it didn’t seem like King had an agenda, but was advocating for what he truly saw as a way out of the spiritual issues the people of the world were already facing in mid 20th century, which have gotten even worse in the 21st.
Something also has to be said about his fantastic writing: it’s obvious the man is a fantastic orator because of the way in which he writes. It manages to feel grandiose but not never cheap or fanciful. You can hear his voice booming across the page while reading the myriad essays in here. Never knew he was as good a writer as he was an orator. Pleasantly surprised.
In conclusion, immensely glad to have read the man. One of those figures that you have just got to read: we owe much to his philosophy, deep and well reasoned as it was. Truly one of the great figures of the modern era, but not because of his actions; because he had the will and discipline to carry the torch even in darkest night.