Le mot Joie est un mot aussi important chez Bergson que chez les Prophètes : la joie qui fait danser les hommes, la joie des radieux lendemains, ne tient-elle pas avant tout à la délivrance, c'est-à-dire à l'opération de la liberté ? Cette délivrance est infinie, comme est continuelle la guerre libératrice qui nous sert à conquérir et à sans cesse reconquérir notre liberté toujours menacée. La délivrance de l'homme empirique ne prendra donc jamais fin ; incapable de jouir dans l'intervalle d'une liberté en acte, l'homme sera en lutte jusqu'à la fin des temps, et sa libération ne cessera jamais. Car, pour ce qui est de la Jérusalem de lumière, de la Ville invisible des légendes russes, de la céleste Kitiège de notre espoir, c'est là un grand mystère dont la mort nous sépare irréversiblement et que nous ne pouvons connaître en ce monde. Aussi est-ce dès ici-bas que doit fleurir et refleurir dans nos cœurs l'invisible cité où les hommes n'ont plus ni faim ni soif, ne grelottent plus de misère et de froid, et ne souffrent plus les uns par les autres. Alors nous entendrons peut-être dans le silence les anges de la nuit qui nous parlent de la lointaine Kitiège et chuchotent à notre oreille les choses indicibles. Vladimir Jankélévitch.
Vladimir Jankélévitch était un philosophe et musicologue français. Il était le fils de Samuel Jankélévitch, un médecin juif ukrainien qui s'était installé en France après avoir fui les progroms antisémites.
Vladimir Jankélévitch was a French philosopher and musicologist. He was the son of Samuel Jankélévitch, a Ukrainian Jewish doctor who moved to France after fleeing the anti-Semitic pogroms.
220111: as this is (not) one of my favourite bergson books i have necessarily decided to put this argument here, after having read somewhere around 55 books involving him to some extent. this is inspired by so many texts i do not name them. just need to write this down. basically the idea is b works with metaphysics directly opposite that of 'physics', the view from the future, the view that 'energy' has inevitably declined in entropy, whereas b sees energy as 'vital' process that is not physics, is not decreasing, but rather increasing, complexifying, and to arguments this makes 'energy' metaphorical and cannot, for example, drive an engine, this is the 'energy' with which we think and live and physics alone cannot explain these processes... to arguments that scientific materialism explains how each organ works, there is the fact organs are not mechanical parts that suffice themselves but must be integrated and this is by life, this is 'simple fact' that develops through time, through evolution, not retrospective construction or creationism...
this took me three (3!) times to read over the years and i have only decided on this review now despite not fully convinced by some of vj's arguments, though i still very much appreciate b as thinker, only seeing him in context of his era do i sense his aversion to trends of philosophy then, since and current...
not much new here for me, just more elaborate argumentation, certain insistence that the key to understanding 'life' is 'time', and this is matter of quality, of change in kind, rather than quantity, or change in degrees... but then this is my 55th book on, by, or invoking b...
for this is not introductory, assumes you the reader has extensive knowledge of philosophy of history, of greek ancients, french contemporaries, is an academic translation from early and midcentury 1900s, and begins with unstated radical inversion of ways of thought common to 'western' metaphysics. this is fine, once you get familiar with it. in his thought we are confronted with the common error of time as retrospective idol, from which manifold further errors spawn, from which the entire biological time is misconceived as 'creationist' 'fabrication' rather than simple 'organic' totalities (if there is anything b values it is the 'simple fact'), rather 'mechanism' of parts that can be separated than necessary wholes. retrospective means we look backwards from the completed and do not recognise the creation, the vital impulse, and in this i realise b works with an entirely different schema of 'energy', of 'impulse', is substance monist and tendency dualist (pg 144)...
with this retrospective view there is the illusion of future perfect, so we create the idol of 'space-time' which b considers on the lines of famed achilles and the tortoise, though from what seems to be generally accepted theory of relativity (and practical application such as gps) it is here that vj if not b are mistaken to talk of 'reality' having precedence over these 'phantasms', though best to read The Physicist and the Philosopher: Einstein, Bergson, and the Debate that Changed Our Understanding of Time... i do not understand the math...
this book continues with vj undertaking to describe how b insists on freedom, on freedom in 'time', and the difference between being 'actor' in living and 'spectator', in referring first to Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness but building on these insights as b does, in fact this work by vj integrates the timeline of b's oeuvre (with qualifications that he was never concerned with systematic rigour)...
b contrasts 'instinct' with 'intellection' and asserts it is only intuition that can unite what instinct searches for futiley and intellection could find but does not know to search for...
b considers the brain as kind of telegraphic exchange, whose ultimate function is to 'delay', to make possible 'time' for thought to accomplish its acts, such there is reversal of act and intention in all species: birds do not fly because they have wings, they want to fly thus have wings- this is creative evolution in action- and the 'mind' is not the 'brain' transposed, b believes in dualism where the mind/memory is infinite freedom (time) and 'matter' (space) is the way in which humans interact with the world, the limit that makes it possible...
'time' is not moving image of eternity: eternity is the illusion, time is the real, the simple fact...
for humans are 'time', not accidentally, partially, modally: entirely and as 'time' humans are necessarily freedom. this is the optimism that b proclaims, that he will find in saints and heroes, that end this book before appendices on judaism (do not know bible so cannot comment much) and various letters...
Sicuramente una monografia fondamentale per chi voglia studiare Bergson. L'analisi a tutto tondo, di tutte le opere del filosofo francese, è magistrale, da parte di Jankélévitch che non si dimentica di utilizzare, a volte, anche un linguaggio poetico e lirico.
L'ultimo capitolo e l'appendice sui rapporti fra la filosofia bergsoniana e il giudaismo sono fenomenali. Nell'appendice coesistono migliaia di spunti, letture trasversali che ci restituiscono un'immagine niente affatto banale di Henri Bergson e della sua "filosofia della durata".