Dame Agatha Christie and Her Peers
A note on the publishing information page says: "To aid catalogers and collectors, this title is printed in an edition limited to 80 copies. It has been manufactured in the United States to American Library Association standards on permanent, durable, acid-free paper." It seems to me Aeonian Press (Mattituck) spent a lot of money to print only 80 copies. Or did Amereon House publish this? Both publishers are mentioned. Perhaps they each printed 40 copies? Anyway, one must ask: Was it worth the money? Or did they know only 80 or so people would buy it? I checked it out of the local library and $3.09 is written on the inside of the front cover. (And odder still, there is no publication date.)
CAST - 1 star: I like very much that Marsh provides a list of cast members at the beginning of the novel (in the edition I read). Jasper Garnett is the officiating priest of the odd House of the Sacred Flame. Cara Quayne is the Chosen Vessel (and that is never explained). Then there are 2 gay characters: Claude Wheatley and Lionel Smith. Now, I do understand that in the 1920's there was a sort of tumultuous interest in gay entertainers (America and Europe, not sure about Marsh's New Zealand) then a rather vicious backlash in the 1930s. And Marsh must have had some kind of 'derogatory terms for gay folks" thesaurus handy as she disses Claude and Lionel incessantly. They lisp, they mince, the dark one in the purple shirt faints by page 36, wiggling occurs on page 43. On page 45, "Claude...walked with small steps.." and talked "in a sort of feeble scream.." Things get worse:
"Oh," cried Inspector Fox suddenly in a falsetto voice, "oh, Inspector, I think I'm going to be sick....What a loathly, what a nauseating, what an unspeakable little drollop."
"Horrid, wasn't it" agreed Alleyn absently.
And on and on it goes. Yes, I know some people will say "Well, that's just the way people talked about gay folks in the 1930s."
But what do you think about a character saying this: "Ain't dat de truff, Lawd!", as there is an American visiting England, this comment apparently directed toward him.
That said, the first half of this book takes place in this "House" and perhaps, just perhaps, everyone is putting on a show (I'm being generous) and when Alleyn and crew enter, they just play along. 1 star, but only because the author list the cast up front, as one naturally would if preparing a hand-out to stage play attendees. A Playbill of sorts.
ATMOSPHERE -2: The "House" has naked statues and all kinds of 'spiritual'-type set pieces. Altars, engravings, incense, and more. It's not spooky, just sorta silly. Like a cheap first-grade idea of a Halloween horror house. Funny silly.
Plot - 1: Early, there is a murder. It's a rather standard poisoning. And you know it's going to be a woman because, in Marsh's world painted here, the men are all heroic (except for the gay couple, the he-he boys) and certainly aren't going to die. Yea, this book is misogynistic.
INVESTIGATION - 1: Alleyn and gang seem to be fine with the homophobia, or, at best, are just playing along with a staging of a murder. But if you've read any amount of murder mysteries, you'll know it all by page 45 or so.
RESOLUTION - 1: Oh, please. As if it was even worth writing in the first place.
SUMMARY: I'm giving this a generous 1.2 rating. This is homophobic, xenophobic, racist, misogynistic and represents the worst in murder mystery writing. I'm going to assume, then, that this was reprinted with only 80 copies by an American publisher to demonstrate the very worst in penmanship in the 1930s...on a global level and is used as a textbook for classes titled "How NOT to write a novel" or perhaps as a textbook explaining "This is why Agatha Christie is the world's best-selling novelist."