This graphic novel was an intense read, packed with opposing political narratives embodied by three central figures. I say narratives rather than ideologies because fighting for an idea such as “freedom” does not necessarily mean fighting for a specific nation that claims to represent that ideal. However, in this story, the two seemed inseparable for much of the plot. Every character appears to serve an ideological function.
The U.S. propaganda, standing for “freedom,” was quite irritating — yet I have to admit, it did its job well. It reflected the still-prevalent perception of the U.S. as a global symbol of liberty, offering insight into the mindset of those who genuinely believe America stands for freedom rather than oppression. For readers unfamiliar with the nation’s violent history, this could easily be misleading. Still, a brief interaction between Dennis and Andy revealed a clear critique of the American system, mocking “American exceptionalism” and “American optimism” as being “too cute.” In my view, that moment exposed the authors’ true intentions. Another incisive line on page 77 confirmed it: “It is never about the people. It is always about the power.” This suggests that the dialogues between Chinese and American propaganda merely serve as a display of public narrative, a surface-level performance rather than genuine ideological debate.
This hints at the conclusion that the authors’ true message was to warn against over-identification with rigid political ideologies, especially those intertwined with one’s national identity. Yet, they manage to do so without making this warning entirely explicit. There remains a deliberate openness — a space for doubt — which, in my opinion, is what makes this novel so intriguing. That ambiguity invites the reader to question their own assumptions about patriotism, ideology, and the narratives we’re taught to believe.
All in all, the novel sometimes left me confused. It presents itself as a near-realistic alternative world, yet contradicts itself in its portrayal of Andy as a pacifist figure unwilling to resist oppression through radical action with possible necessity to having to recur to violence, despite his activist parents. Coming from such a background, Andy should realistically understand that oppressors rarely respond to polite appeals for liberation. His anger at Maggie felt unconvincing and poorly thought through, creating a rift between his characterization and the story’s political message.
Olivia’s role as a spy added welcome tension to the plot. However, the connection between her and the little girl who died in the nuclear explosion was never clearly explained. The girl simply appears and then haunts Olivia throughout the novel. Conceptually, that’s fascinating, symbolically rich even, but the emotional and narrative link between them could have been communicated more effectively.
As for the dialogues, I’m still uncertain. I haven’t read enough graphic novels to provide a strong comparison, but at times the conversations felt shallow or slightly corny. Then again, that might stem from cultural differences in expression, perhaps a reflection of the distinctly American tone of dialogue.
Despite its flaws, the novel was a refreshing and captivating read. Anyone seeking a fast-paced revolutionary story will likely enjoy it. Most of all, the artwork is extraordinary. I found myself pausing after each page just to admire the panels. Even if the story doesn’t fully convince you, the visuals more than make up for it. The art style matches well visually with the dramatic tone of the story.