Did you know that your Christianity was heavily influenced by a bunch of couples in California in the 1960s doing LSD evangelism?
There is a huge chasm between the 1600s and 1900s, and right in the center of that transformation stand the Jesus People and how they reworked Evangelical Christianity for the hippie movement of the 1960s.
The author, Larry Eskridge, wrote this book over ten years ago, and so reading it today comes with multiple emotional layers for me, since the word "Evangelical Christian" brings a lot of positive and negative baggage with it.
Eskridge was the perfect man to write this book, since he had an affection for the Jesus People movement when it first came out, and so he writes as both an insider who understood the motivations of the people involved and as a professional historian.
For ordinary readers, the narrative focused chapters (mostly at the beginning but some interesting stuff on cults towards the end) will bear the most interest. The first chapter tracks a commune of four married couples who, as aforementioned, did LSD. That doesn't do them justice though. They had a clear doctrine of sin and they sincerely, oh so sincerely, tried to follow Acts 2 and spend day-in and day-out having long-haired hippies in their homes. Among others, they had Charles Manson in their midst (he didn't stay long).
They were naive. The book in many ways is a good case study for what can go wrong when young people get together in a commune with no worries about sacrificing family on the altar of outreach. To take one famous example, Lonnie Frisbee, a real preacher of the Gospel (I've seen the clips), had trouble with his marriage, and when his wife went to Chuck Smith, she claims he said that her concerns were insignificant in the light of the work that Lonnie was doing. Wut?
Similarly, the communalist living crashed in all the predictable ways. Further, while the Jesus People believed in the Bible, they seem to have had a very thin knowledge of the Bible, given how they often were vulnerable to cults. Obviously, that's to begin to evaluate the movement, but I can't help it; the Jesus People are family. My mom was saved in the wake of the Jesus People movement. My dad was discipled in its culture, and I experienced the vibe, largely through the music and pop culture that came out of it. Thought I didn't listen to Michael Smith or even Keith Green, I did experience Michael Card, VeggieTales, Steve Greene, and much of the conversion-centric vibe. As I listened to Eskridge, I found myself nodding my head, saying, "Yep, yep, I remember that."
The saddest thing about reading this book is that you can see the creation of all the social and mental habits that would create so-called Big Eva--the tendency to emotionalism, with a dash of Pentecostalism; the naive activism which then was improperly transferred to politics; and the need to accommodate the Gospel to American culture in such a way that it took out Evangelicalism's backbone.
But underneath that, despite all the naivete of the original Jesus People, there was a beating heart that recognized that whether someone had a personal relationship with Jesus was the most important part of a person's life and wanted to get that in front of as many people as possible as clearly and simply as possible. And then wanted to disciple men and women to just love each other. All of these impulses are so attractive.
It's clear in a negative world where Christianity is a minority religion that courage, hard-headedness, and common sense are absolute must-haves for Christians right now. They always have been. The Jesus People option is not enough. The only way a community can survive is if it can say "no" to wolves and to disobedient sheep. Many Evangelicals are aware of this, but not, I fear, the majority.
And yet, we cannot do Christianity outside of our times and context. Even as I look at the failure of Evangelical Christianity to create a cohesive culture, I still remember with fondness the fact that every church I attended has been a believing church, that the Gospel was proclaimed, that people did want to help, even if they didn't know how.
In the closing chapter, Eskridge points to how the Jesus People made young people more sexually and politically conservative than they were before. It's a moving testament, and I hope that the best of this movement can be taken forward.