What do you think?
Rate this book
Understanding and Applying the Bible: Revised and Expanded
A solid introduction to the ins and outs of biblical hermeneutics, without the intimidation that often accompanies this subject. With the help of this revised edition, pastors, students and laypersons need no prior knowledge of biblical exegesis to create their own Bible commentaries.
384 pages, Kindle Edition
First published January 1, 1983
55 people are currently reading
186 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 29 of 29 reviews
September 25, 2016
The first chapter, McQuilken begins by identifying the authority of the Scriptures, and introduces the approaches to applying and understanding the Scriptures. The second chapter discusses the super naturalistic approach of pre-moderns. A quote from this chapter, McQuilkin writes, “The Holy Spirit will never say something through the biblical writer, then contradict or change it for the reader. In other words, God will never enlighten the Christian through some understanding or application of scripture that would in any way depart from what is written. If He did this, there would be no way to know if our interpretation was from the Spirit, from our sinful inclinations, from Satan, or from psychological or physical stimuli.” (P.37) I appreciate this quote because what he says solidifies the truth of one meaning. If the text is open to our own interpretation rather than on the original intent, there would be no authoritative standard for the original intent of Scripture.
Chapter three discusses the naturalistic approach. This approach is based upon the rationality of the interpreter rather than on the authority of the Scriptures. McQuilken writes, “The whole design of the Bible is to challenge suppositions not to be controlled by them.” (P.50) If an interpreter enters the reading of the text with presuppositions it can easily become a personal private interpretation. It is possible to want something to be true so badly that a reader can twist the Scripture to say anything.
Chapter four discusses the history of postmodernism, the core beliefs, and the influence that postmodernism has on evangelicalism. Chapter five covers the dogmatic approach. A noted quote, “not only is the systematic study of Scripture valid, it is necessary.” (P.67) I can see the danger of the dogmatic approach, interpretation based upon what another person says. In fact, I believe our churches are full of people who hold to a dogmatic approach for no other reason than that they have been told to believe so.
Chapter six propels the reader into an introduction of the basic hermeneutical principles. With the conclusion of hermeneutical history, it appears that the meat of the book begins with chapter six. Notable quote, “to understand the authors meaning, the reader must understand the context from which the author writes. Only that way can the effect of the differences between author and recipient be overcome and true understanding become possible.” (P.78)
In chapter seven McQuilken discusses the importance of communication. He writes, “A relationship of love gives the ultimate significance in human life, and such a relationship depends on understanding what the other person is thinking. That is what communication is all about: enabling the other person to understand what one is thinking.” (P.96) He recognizes the fact that “if the Bible is to be authoritative it must be understandable.” (P.99) And, he reiterates the fact that the author had one meaning. Yet the author often uses metaphorical and figurative language.
In chapter eight McQuilken discusses the importance of interpreting the Scriptures based upon the historical, physical, and cultural setting. He writes, “the interpreter needs first to discover all he can concerning the author: who he was, where and when he wrote, and under what circumstances he wrote.” (P.110) I can appreciate the importance of this concept after reading about the prison epistles and thinking about the joy in Paul’s heart despite his suffering and imprisonment. This truth really puts the book of Philippians into perspective.
In chapter nine McQuilken discusses the importance of word study. He writes, “Words are the basic building blocks for understanding the meaning of any passage.” While I have not forgotten, I have neglected to think about the reality that God’s Word is, at its base, communication. A communication that has been written specifically to a certain person or group, but lasts forever. It is to be understood by all interpreters in the same way as it was originally intended. I think that sometimes we think that we are clever as we look for something fascinating in order to impress ourselves or others. Since there is one meaning, he writes, “If God the Holy Spirit took the care to inspire the very words, we must be careful to search out the intent of the author in his choice of words.” In this chapter McQuilken gives examples of how to do word studies. After reading this chapter the importance of word study is clear, since there are variations of Greek and English words.
In chapter ten McQuilken discusses the analysis of thought structure and sentence. He writes, “Individual words are not suspended in isolation, but linked together… the initial goal of Bible study is to determine the single meaning intended by the author.” The specifics and sentence structure is put into perspective. The Bible is coherent; therefore, it must be interpreted in a coherent manner, word by word, sentence by sentence… in context. (P.155)
In chapter eleven McQuilken continues to build upon the interpretation of words, sentence, and context. He writes, “The primary source for understanding the setting of a passage is its context. The most important element in a word study is the word’s use in a particular context.” (P.175) He continues, “The purpose an author had in mind when writing a book influences every passage in the book.” It was interesting to receive a warning regarding the chapter and verse divisions. I have not really given that much thought. I suppose that I assumed the presence of division was proper and made for easier reading and understanding. It was also convicting to read that he considers approaching the context carelessly as shameful and sinful. I love the repetitive demands to read in context searching for the intent of the original author.
In chapter twelve McQuilken discusses the importance of understanding the difference of interpreting figurative and literal language and understanding. He writes, “Since the Bible was written by human beings, it must be treated as any other human communication in determining the meaning intended by the author.” (P.190) He defines the different forms or figures of speech and leads the reader to think more carefully about such things, using guidelines.
Chapter fifteen discusses the unity of Scripture and the importance of using the whole Bible to exposit itself, comparing Scripture with Scripture. McQuilken writes, “ the student must seek the unity of that passage with all other Bible teachings relating to it. It will not do to determine the meaning of a passage independent of the rest of the Scripture.” (P.236) McQuilken explains the difference between parallel passages, similar ideas, and contrasting ideas.
Chapter sixteen discusses the coherency of Scripture. McQuilken writes, “God is not nearly so Interested in what I know as He is in what I am and how I behave.” It is important to study the Bible as a whole rather than taking bits and pieces to fulfill our presuppositions. As we develop theology we can only do so when reading the Scripture as a whole and for the right purpose.
Chapter seventeen discusses alleged contradictions. We hold to the truth that the Scriptures are inspired by God. This presupposition leads us to believe that the Scriptures are ignorant and that what seems to be a contradiction can be explained by a deeper study of God’s Word. McQuilken writes, “we approach the problems of Scripture in the confidence that there is some solution and refuse to interpret any passage as if it were in error.” (P.278)
Chapter eighteen discusses the proper way to interpret prophetic passages. McQuilken writes, “the first guideline for understanding predictive prophecy in Scripture is a principle that guides in the interpretation of all Scripture: take the passage in its most simple, direct, and ordinary meaning unless there are compelling reasons to do otherwise.” P. 283 Types are different than parallel passages, and the difference is that types are identified in the Scriptures (elsewhere, by another writer).
The concluding chapters of the book cover the most important aspect of hermeneutics. The application of what has been taught by God’s Word. It should be apparent that the purpose for rightly interpreting Scripture is obedience and application to what has been learned. McQuilken writes, “The goal of all Bible study is to apply the truth of Scripture to life. If that application is not made, all the put into making sure of the authors intended meaning will have gone for naught. In fact, to know and not do doubles the offense of disobedience.” (P.327)
I appreciate what McQuilken writes on page 329 concerning relationships. He writes, “the leader of the church who does not search out all biblical teaching on relationships among believers and does not seek ways to correct wrong or inadequate relationships has stopped short of the final and indispensable step in Bible study-application.” McQuilken has some great examples of application that are often overlooked.
McQuilken discusses principles of Scripture and identifies how to apply them in spite of cultural gaps. The charts provided are great resources to help identify the method for application. In the conclusion McQuilken helps readers to think about the danger of abusing God’s Word. And reminds readers that there is always something to gain even if the Word is mishandled.
McQuilken wrote an excellent book on hermeneutics. One of the most helpful tips was the continual reminder (nearly every chapter) about the reality that Scripture has only one meaning. There is an original author, with original intent, and original readers. Although, I have often heard similar things, I don’t believe I have ever read a book where the last reality has been stressed to such a degree. I appreciated the lists of tips and advice, the charts, and the bibliography. The dictionary and book recommendations were also helpful. I walk away from this book fearful about the possibility of mishandling God’s Word. It is easy to become relaxed in preparation, in reality preparation is hard work.
All quotes taken from:
McQuilken, Robertson. Understanding and Applying the Bible. Moody Publishers: Chicago, 2009. Print
Chapter three discusses the naturalistic approach. This approach is based upon the rationality of the interpreter rather than on the authority of the Scriptures. McQuilken writes, “The whole design of the Bible is to challenge suppositions not to be controlled by them.” (P.50) If an interpreter enters the reading of the text with presuppositions it can easily become a personal private interpretation. It is possible to want something to be true so badly that a reader can twist the Scripture to say anything.
Chapter four discusses the history of postmodernism, the core beliefs, and the influence that postmodernism has on evangelicalism. Chapter five covers the dogmatic approach. A noted quote, “not only is the systematic study of Scripture valid, it is necessary.” (P.67) I can see the danger of the dogmatic approach, interpretation based upon what another person says. In fact, I believe our churches are full of people who hold to a dogmatic approach for no other reason than that they have been told to believe so.
Chapter six propels the reader into an introduction of the basic hermeneutical principles. With the conclusion of hermeneutical history, it appears that the meat of the book begins with chapter six. Notable quote, “to understand the authors meaning, the reader must understand the context from which the author writes. Only that way can the effect of the differences between author and recipient be overcome and true understanding become possible.” (P.78)
In chapter seven McQuilken discusses the importance of communication. He writes, “A relationship of love gives the ultimate significance in human life, and such a relationship depends on understanding what the other person is thinking. That is what communication is all about: enabling the other person to understand what one is thinking.” (P.96) He recognizes the fact that “if the Bible is to be authoritative it must be understandable.” (P.99) And, he reiterates the fact that the author had one meaning. Yet the author often uses metaphorical and figurative language.
In chapter eight McQuilken discusses the importance of interpreting the Scriptures based upon the historical, physical, and cultural setting. He writes, “the interpreter needs first to discover all he can concerning the author: who he was, where and when he wrote, and under what circumstances he wrote.” (P.110) I can appreciate the importance of this concept after reading about the prison epistles and thinking about the joy in Paul’s heart despite his suffering and imprisonment. This truth really puts the book of Philippians into perspective.
In chapter nine McQuilken discusses the importance of word study. He writes, “Words are the basic building blocks for understanding the meaning of any passage.” While I have not forgotten, I have neglected to think about the reality that God’s Word is, at its base, communication. A communication that has been written specifically to a certain person or group, but lasts forever. It is to be understood by all interpreters in the same way as it was originally intended. I think that sometimes we think that we are clever as we look for something fascinating in order to impress ourselves or others. Since there is one meaning, he writes, “If God the Holy Spirit took the care to inspire the very words, we must be careful to search out the intent of the author in his choice of words.” In this chapter McQuilken gives examples of how to do word studies. After reading this chapter the importance of word study is clear, since there are variations of Greek and English words.
In chapter ten McQuilken discusses the analysis of thought structure and sentence. He writes, “Individual words are not suspended in isolation, but linked together… the initial goal of Bible study is to determine the single meaning intended by the author.” The specifics and sentence structure is put into perspective. The Bible is coherent; therefore, it must be interpreted in a coherent manner, word by word, sentence by sentence… in context. (P.155)
In chapter eleven McQuilken continues to build upon the interpretation of words, sentence, and context. He writes, “The primary source for understanding the setting of a passage is its context. The most important element in a word study is the word’s use in a particular context.” (P.175) He continues, “The purpose an author had in mind when writing a book influences every passage in the book.” It was interesting to receive a warning regarding the chapter and verse divisions. I have not really given that much thought. I suppose that I assumed the presence of division was proper and made for easier reading and understanding. It was also convicting to read that he considers approaching the context carelessly as shameful and sinful. I love the repetitive demands to read in context searching for the intent of the original author.
In chapter twelve McQuilken discusses the importance of understanding the difference of interpreting figurative and literal language and understanding. He writes, “Since the Bible was written by human beings, it must be treated as any other human communication in determining the meaning intended by the author.” (P.190) He defines the different forms or figures of speech and leads the reader to think more carefully about such things, using guidelines.
Chapter fifteen discusses the unity of Scripture and the importance of using the whole Bible to exposit itself, comparing Scripture with Scripture. McQuilken writes, “ the student must seek the unity of that passage with all other Bible teachings relating to it. It will not do to determine the meaning of a passage independent of the rest of the Scripture.” (P.236) McQuilken explains the difference between parallel passages, similar ideas, and contrasting ideas.
Chapter sixteen discusses the coherency of Scripture. McQuilken writes, “God is not nearly so Interested in what I know as He is in what I am and how I behave.” It is important to study the Bible as a whole rather than taking bits and pieces to fulfill our presuppositions. As we develop theology we can only do so when reading the Scripture as a whole and for the right purpose.
Chapter seventeen discusses alleged contradictions. We hold to the truth that the Scriptures are inspired by God. This presupposition leads us to believe that the Scriptures are ignorant and that what seems to be a contradiction can be explained by a deeper study of God’s Word. McQuilken writes, “we approach the problems of Scripture in the confidence that there is some solution and refuse to interpret any passage as if it were in error.” (P.278)
Chapter eighteen discusses the proper way to interpret prophetic passages. McQuilken writes, “the first guideline for understanding predictive prophecy in Scripture is a principle that guides in the interpretation of all Scripture: take the passage in its most simple, direct, and ordinary meaning unless there are compelling reasons to do otherwise.” P. 283 Types are different than parallel passages, and the difference is that types are identified in the Scriptures (elsewhere, by another writer).
The concluding chapters of the book cover the most important aspect of hermeneutics. The application of what has been taught by God’s Word. It should be apparent that the purpose for rightly interpreting Scripture is obedience and application to what has been learned. McQuilken writes, “The goal of all Bible study is to apply the truth of Scripture to life. If that application is not made, all the put into making sure of the authors intended meaning will have gone for naught. In fact, to know and not do doubles the offense of disobedience.” (P.327)
I appreciate what McQuilken writes on page 329 concerning relationships. He writes, “the leader of the church who does not search out all biblical teaching on relationships among believers and does not seek ways to correct wrong or inadequate relationships has stopped short of the final and indispensable step in Bible study-application.” McQuilken has some great examples of application that are often overlooked.
McQuilken discusses principles of Scripture and identifies how to apply them in spite of cultural gaps. The charts provided are great resources to help identify the method for application. In the conclusion McQuilken helps readers to think about the danger of abusing God’s Word. And reminds readers that there is always something to gain even if the Word is mishandled.
McQuilken wrote an excellent book on hermeneutics. One of the most helpful tips was the continual reminder (nearly every chapter) about the reality that Scripture has only one meaning. There is an original author, with original intent, and original readers. Although, I have often heard similar things, I don’t believe I have ever read a book where the last reality has been stressed to such a degree. I appreciated the lists of tips and advice, the charts, and the bibliography. The dictionary and book recommendations were also helpful. I walk away from this book fearful about the possibility of mishandling God’s Word. It is easy to become relaxed in preparation, in reality preparation is hard work.
All quotes taken from:
McQuilken, Robertson. Understanding and Applying the Bible. Moody Publishers: Chicago, 2009. Print
August 28, 2024
Timeless, practical, useful, worthy of laymen and pastors to read and reread every year to make sure we approach the Bible as we should, God's communication to us and how to avoid unhealthful approaches, have faith and be humble and let the Bible speak for itself as much as we can. While in seminary this was the best book outside the Bible that I studied and used.
June 5, 2023
Although volumes have been written on the subject of Bible interpretation, not many of those books are really all that helpful in synthesizing the principles of Bible interpretation at the worldview level. Robertson McQuilkin is one of the few that addresses the issues at the root level. Although McQuilkin didn't deal with every relevant text, and there are certain elements the reader can disagree with, overall, he has given an excellent presentation of his approach to Bible interpretation. The work adequately addresses both the physical and divine aspects of Bible hermeneutics, avoiding the ditches of mysticism and higher criticism. The curious Bible student will be well served by reading this book.
In conclusion, McQuilkin provides a very good overview of the essential elements of Bible interpretation. The book would serve as a good introduction to the subject for the uninitiated or an excellent addition for further study to someone who is already educated on the topic. There is value for anyone who is interested in better understanding Bible hermeneutics.
Read the full academic book review here: https://www.academia.edu/102878724/Re...
In conclusion, McQuilkin provides a very good overview of the essential elements of Bible interpretation. The book would serve as a good introduction to the subject for the uninitiated or an excellent addition for further study to someone who is already educated on the topic. There is value for anyone who is interested in better understanding Bible hermeneutics.
Read the full academic book review here: https://www.academia.edu/102878724/Re...
January 11, 2019
This was a very good manual on how to study Scripture. I have never been formally training via seminary or other class on how to read, study and teach Scripture. This was a great introduction on methods. This book does not necessary discuss how to teach it, but I think it gives a very detailed explanation for tools on understanding what you are reading. It is then the teachers job to find a way to communicate that truth to their students.
July 13, 2021
This book was incredibly informative. The author defines hermeneutics in the first few chapters and then goes into detail to teach the reader how proper interpretation is done. McQuilkin describes how presuppositions can hinder a modern reader's understanding of the Bible and how to acknowledge and change such beliefs. The author also describes faulty methods of interpretation and warns the reader against falling into such categories. He then goes on to define the different genres of the Bible. McQuilkin then describes these genres and equips the reader to read these genres in the proper way. There are plenty of examples of interpretation throughout this book as well. This book was an interesting introduction to the art and science of hermeneutics.
August 21, 2025
A good book laying out the basics of literary and scriptural interpretation. I had a few disagreements here and there (I don't think Paul's main point in Ephesians 5 and 6 is "mutual submission"), but overall, it is very solid and worthy of reference.
February 8, 2021
Robertson gives great piratical advice for approaching the word of God.
"The goal of all Bible study is to apply the truth of Scripture to life."
"The goal of all Bible study is to apply the truth of Scripture to life."
July 6, 2025
This had some amazing nuggets, but it was also filled with the typical biased assumptions of Evangelicalism: Sola Scriptura, Catholicism is wrong.
January 10, 2024
I read this book in college and it transformed my understanding of the Bible.
December 30, 2019
A great book for understanding hermanuetics (in all of it's small parts) and its importance.
December 1, 2020
The first four chapters were fantastic. I loved the break down of different readings throughout history. It was insightful, interesting, and really cool to see how history progressed. I agreed with his thesis of trying to find the literal meaning of the Bible and reading it like any other piece of historical work. Learning the context, understanding the language, recognizing the type of literature and the author and reader are invaluable to truly understand God's message for us.
It wasn't that I disagreed with his other points so much as they either didn't make sense, or seemed like far too much work to be helpful. I've never found value in sentence diagramming, and this book isn't going to change my mind. I find little value in doing "word" studies (I know them as extended definition essays) {correction 2020- after going through the class, I understand better what is meant by word studies. This is looking for the word in the original Greek and getting a better understanding of the definition. An obvious example is LOVE. The original Greek had four words that we translate to love, and all four mean something different. Word studies are not only really useful, they are really cool and offer great insight into our Bible reading. There are also websites and tools that do most of the work for us now, so they are also not that hard to do.} and looking up EVERY use of a word in any book isn't going to be helpful.. And his reflections on who the Bible is teaching to seemed more confusing than insightful.
This book was right down the middle. A lot of really good ideas and fascinating insight, and a lot of ideas that I don't see holding any value.
It wasn't that I disagreed with his other points so much as they either didn't make sense, or seemed like far too much work to be helpful. I've never found value in sentence diagramming, and this book isn't going to change my mind. I find little value in doing "word" studies (I know them as extended definition essays) {correction 2020- after going through the class, I understand better what is meant by word studies. This is looking for the word in the original Greek and getting a better understanding of the definition. An obvious example is LOVE. The original Greek had four words that we translate to love, and all four mean something different. Word studies are not only really useful, they are really cool and offer great insight into our Bible reading. There are also websites and tools that do most of the work for us now, so they are also not that hard to do.} and looking up EVERY use of a word in any book isn't going to be helpful.. And his reflections on who the Bible is teaching to seemed more confusing than insightful.
This book was right down the middle. A lot of really good ideas and fascinating insight, and a lot of ideas that I don't see holding any value.
July 21, 2023
First read (c. 2003):
As an undergrad just beginning to emerge from far right Fundamentalism.
Five star
Whoa! This is amazing! There's someone else who says it's not ok to just make the Bible say whatever we want it to say! There is actually a whole science about making sure we get it right!
----------------
Second read (2023):
As an academic somewhere left of conservative evangelicalism.
One and a half stars
This textbook is really quite ordinary. I mean, it's simple enough to be accessible to the undergraduate non-theology student, but it's a bit on the fundamentalistic side of things in it's tone and material. I would like to think there's something else out there that is just as accessible but not so mired in positivism.
Also, the section on word studies in both this edition and the 2009 edition is just awful... truly, tragically, and chronically awful. Like, I don't think the author understands how semantics work. At all. Very dangerous if students take it seriously.
A number of other serious concerns. Not completely awful overall, but a long way from ideal.
As an undergrad just beginning to emerge from far right Fundamentalism.
Five star
Whoa! This is amazing! There's someone else who says it's not ok to just make the Bible say whatever we want it to say! There is actually a whole science about making sure we get it right!
----------------
Second read (2023):
As an academic somewhere left of conservative evangelicalism.
One and a half stars
This textbook is really quite ordinary. I mean, it's simple enough to be accessible to the undergraduate non-theology student, but it's a bit on the fundamentalistic side of things in it's tone and material. I would like to think there's something else out there that is just as accessible but not so mired in positivism.
Also, the section on word studies in both this edition and the 2009 edition is just awful... truly, tragically, and chronically awful. Like, I don't think the author understands how semantics work. At all. Very dangerous if students take it seriously.
A number of other serious concerns. Not completely awful overall, but a long way from ideal.
February 17, 2014
In this book, McQuilkin has provided a sound, well-balanced introduction to hermeneutics suitable for Bible College or seminary instruction. It is practical, thorough, and well organized, yet is clearly written in plain language suitable for the average reader.
McQuilkin addresses the primary concerns of biblical interpretation such as historical and cultural setting, word study, thought structure, context, figurative language, the various genres of literature, interpretation, and application. He provides principles and supporting guidelines to help the believer properly determine precisely what Scripture means and how God intends for us to apply His revealed will.
This is an excellent resource for anyone who needs to understand exegesis. I would highly recommend it for anyone looking for an introductory text.
McQuilkin addresses the primary concerns of biblical interpretation such as historical and cultural setting, word study, thought structure, context, figurative language, the various genres of literature, interpretation, and application. He provides principles and supporting guidelines to help the believer properly determine precisely what Scripture means and how God intends for us to apply His revealed will.
This is an excellent resource for anyone who needs to understand exegesis. I would highly recommend it for anyone looking for an introductory text.
June 1, 2017
This is a tremendous resource in how to accurately interpret and apply the Bible. McQuilkin is solid on the absolute authority and practical on understanding the meaning intended by the writers. He breaks hermeneutics into 3 simple principles, and then teaches very simply how to practice these and avoid errors. He says that the number one rule of interpretation is context. The only addition I suggest would be to add some emphasis about distinguishing between the old and new covenants.
December 15, 2013
An excellent manual that does just what the title says: it gives rules, principles, and guidelines which enable/encourage the reader to both understand and apply the Bible. It amply answers the question on page 264: " How does one make functional the authority of the Bible in his or her own life and in the life of the church"? Perhaps too complex for newer believers, but still highly recommended.
April 24, 2015
Five stars has to be a life-changer for me, but just in terms of a book that I would recommend that everyone read, this one is on that list. It's a solid how-to for reading and understanding the Bible. It's readable, accessible (not too heavy), and well-structured. I was required to read it as part of a class that I voluntarily signed up for, mostly because I wanted to read a book like this and needed an excuse to do so.
December 28, 2013
Was extremely helpful for understanding hermeneutics. I read this for my Methods of Bible Study and teaching class in college. I found it extremely helpful in understanding how to properly interpret scripture. It was also very understandable, so anyone could read it, not just pastors, those seeking a degree. I personally would suggest it to anyone looking for a good foundation in hermeneutics.
Read
August 21, 20120048
June 1, 2008
The textbook for my Bible Study Methods class through Moody. It was a little hard to follow at times, but a good resource.
Read
July 27, 2011Prety good... nothing ground breaking.
August 3, 2011
A must read!
July 24, 2012
A little dry, but a good introduction to hermeneutics. Not strong on genre.
October 30, 2013
Best read ever as for growing in biblical Truth and Christian growth.
September 17, 2013
For the average person this is the best introduction to Bible interpretation. You won't do better. Get it. Read and re-read it. Digest it. Apply it.
January 3, 2014
Solid, methodical, practical. Read and used this for a class in hermeneutics.
January 2, 2017
An excellent book on how to read and understand the Bible. Every lover of the Bible should read this book!
May 28, 2009
Great one.
April 20, 2017
I had to read this book for a hermeneutics class I took. If I didn't have to read it, I would not have finished it. It is one of the most poorly written books I have ever read. The author is either too wordy or too brief. I would often look back over a section I had just read and wonder what exactly the author expected his readers to get out of that section. The formatting of the text is horrific. Whatever word processor the author used while writing this book justified the last line of some of the paragraphs. In multiple places there would be one word stretched out over an entire line. A good editor would have caught this. Overall, it was a poorly written book and I learned nothing from it.
Displaying 1 - 29 of 29 reviews