I appreciated the overview and depth of the issues in the United States food system but the organization of this book drove me crazy. It started out with a solution and then listed the problems to justify the solution. However, I do not think that local food systems are the only, or even the best solution for several of the problems listed. For example, in my opinion the energy problems would be better solved by zero emissions transportation and electricity.
The latter chapters were much heavier on anecdotes than data. Like there's an urban garden in Detroit, therefore this is how to solve urban food deserts. Only much later without much focus does he mention a stat about Oakland that all the vacant land would only provide enough food for a small portion of the city.
Also, interestingly, there's so much time spent on energy and environment but almost no (or any?) mention of water.
Don't get me wrong, I think the book touches on a lot of important issues, but I think it was a weak way of arguing for a specific solution. I would recommend this to someone as one of many books you read on food systems but I wouldn't treat it as the handbook for solving our food issues.