1 ★ i was initially excited to read this novel because of the concept and comparisons to some of my favorite authors, however, house of marionne is an utter disappointment, and that is mainly due to the way this book was promoted. i believe that the mismarketing of this book will ultimately make it suffer. did i think it was going to be the best book i ever read? no. but i also didn't expect it to be one of the worst books ive read.
this book is not the atlas six meets bridgerton, nor is it for fans of morally grey characters, forbidden romance, sarah j. mass, stepanie garber, or leigh bardugo.
based on those comparisons, you would expect a more mature dark fantasy, but this book is incredibly juvenile and surface-level. the "dark academia" and "morally grey" aspects are shallow and are simply a label slapped on the book without any meaning.
when i see those phrases in the synopsis of a book, i expect the moral ambiguity of the characters to be explored in depth, and for the novel to be a critique of academia. simply being set at a boarding school does not make a book a "dark academia" novel, and having characters with ambiguous morals requires more than just labeling them as such. now, if you're thinking "this is a ya book, it doesn't need to be like that", you are wrong because many ya books do dark academia (legendborn, ace of spades) and morally grey characters (six of crows, these violent Delights, the cruel prince) well.
since this book is said to be for fans of stephanie garber (who has a blurb on the front cover) and leigh bardugo, i expected the quality of the writing and atmosphere to be similar to that of their books. instead, the writing in house of marionne is uninspired, dull, and often repetitive. there is no excitement, charm, creativity, or uniqueness to the writing, and that's probably the worst thing you can say about a book. the lackluster writing not only fails to capture the vibes this novel promised ("ballgowns & betrayal. magic & mystery. decadence & darkness.") but also hinders the development of the characters, making them superficial and one-dimensional. the overuse of exclamation points on every page was also quite annoying. here's just two examples of the *amazing* writing in this book, "oh, there is omg, jordan! he is so hot," and "oh yeah, this guy and i were out doing stuff."
the romantic aspect in house of marionne leaves much to be desired. it lacks depth and fails to evoke any real emotion other than frustration. quell and jordan's relationship is honestly unnecessary, and really just adds more tropes that will lure readers in, but ultimately disappoint them. there's a lot of telling and not showing, so it is difficult to root for their relationship. it's also clear that the author wanted to make jordan the typical brooding, mysterious dark-haired love interest you would find in a fantasy book, but she fails because he is such a bland character.
the main character, quell, is also quite boring. she suffers from being like every other stereotypical protagonist in young adult fantasy; nothing major stands out about her character. and, of course, she comes from a powerful background, has the most dangerous magic, and masters this magic in just a couple days while her peers have been training for years.
i am not a Bridgerton fan and i honestly know nothing about it, but what i do know is that it's set in the regency era. because of that, i thought this book would be set in the past, but it is not. i think this book could have benefitted if it were set in the past, rather than the present, as it would make more sense. i've also seen the author compare this to game of thrones, which i just have to laugh about.
overall, house of marionne fails to deliver what it promised and is an unsatisfying and unoriginal read. thank you penguinteen for an arc in exchange for an honest review.