What do you think?
Rate this book
中国通史
《中国通史2(超值白金版)》是吕思勉先生的史学成名作，也是我国历史上第一部用白话文写成的中国通史。吕思勉是史学界公认的旧籍读得最多的一位学者，二十四史通读数遍，为学界同人传为美谈。吕思勉国学基础深厚，治史的意趣却不保守。本书渗透着吕思勉用新方法、新思想来整理旧国故的精神，被公认为民国以来影响最大的中国通史。
422 pages, Kindle Edition
First published July 1, 2010
138 people are currently reading
89 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews
April 27, 2016
The book(The General History of China) is written by a prominent Chinese scholar of The Republic of China era(民国). One of the most remarkable features of the scholars in this ear is their erudite excellence in traditional Chinese culture and full grasp of classic Chinese language, the salient features that are rarely seen in modern society scholars.
People always bemoan that there are no real masters nowadays when compared to the figures in that era.
This perception is a mixture of the critiques for the current pompous atmosphere and the longing for the accomplishments of the real scholars of the past era. And it savors of a kind of over exaggeration but seems to make some sense to some degree. (maybe)
The past era are always ostensibly deemed better than the modern days , which is quite perplexing for me. Is it true? I don't think any would exchange generations with other people of another era.
So it is quite understandable that the book is written in half-classic Chinese and half-vernacular Chinese, a mixture that I kind of relish. I like this written style but it still poses a hint of trouble , because in the book there are not a few tradition Chinese characters ,not the simplified ones as we use today. These traditional, complex characters are still widely used in Hong Kong, TaiWan and Makau.
History studies and learning must be connected with the social science(ig;sociology) and biological science , and this is firmly espoused by Mr Lv Simian. It is not a book to explicitly explain the rise of fall of dynasties nor concrete particularities . It is a book to give general information on China's history and evolution.(marriage ,currency,political entity，tax，education，ethnics，dynasties...)
What I thought about the book:
1
History is not merely about the old books or ponderous recordings of the past, it must be perceived in a grand perspective and can demonstrate the truth of the society evolution.
2
What is past is prologue. History is in a process of perpetual evolution and unbroken series of causalities . In consequence. it cannot be severed from the past.
History functions to seek truth from the past,illustrate them so as to illuminate the present and predict the future.(经世致用). We learn this to seek our own path instead of following the beaten-track or committing the similar mistakes.
3
The past history books always recorded the historical figures the famous ones in particular, tacitly approving them the meaning of the history. How preposterous.
4 history should not be about politics, it should be about the cultures. Cultures should be inclusive and evolve with the time, but they cannot be transmitted by force, and if so, Conflicts shall emerge.
5.....(will read it again)
People always bemoan that there are no real masters nowadays when compared to the figures in that era.
This perception is a mixture of the critiques for the current pompous atmosphere and the longing for the accomplishments of the real scholars of the past era. And it savors of a kind of over exaggeration but seems to make some sense to some degree. (maybe)
The past era are always ostensibly deemed better than the modern days , which is quite perplexing for me. Is it true? I don't think any would exchange generations with other people of another era.
So it is quite understandable that the book is written in half-classic Chinese and half-vernacular Chinese, a mixture that I kind of relish. I like this written style but it still poses a hint of trouble , because in the book there are not a few tradition Chinese characters ,not the simplified ones as we use today. These traditional, complex characters are still widely used in Hong Kong, TaiWan and Makau.
History studies and learning must be connected with the social science(ig;sociology) and biological science , and this is firmly espoused by Mr Lv Simian. It is not a book to explicitly explain the rise of fall of dynasties nor concrete particularities . It is a book to give general information on China's history and evolution.(marriage ,currency,political entity，tax，education，ethnics，dynasties...)
What I thought about the book:
1
History is not merely about the old books or ponderous recordings of the past, it must be perceived in a grand perspective and can demonstrate the truth of the society evolution.
2
What is past is prologue. History is in a process of perpetual evolution and unbroken series of causalities . In consequence. it cannot be severed from the past.
History functions to seek truth from the past,illustrate them so as to illuminate the present and predict the future.(经世致用). We learn this to seek our own path instead of following the beaten-track or committing the similar mistakes.
3
The past history books always recorded the historical figures the famous ones in particular, tacitly approving them the meaning of the history. How preposterous.
4 history should not be about politics, it should be about the cultures. Cultures should be inclusive and evolve with the time, but they cannot be transmitted by force, and if so, Conflicts shall emerge.
5.....(will read it again)
March 29, 2018
科普泱泱中华文化和历史。吕老先生的博学和多闻让人佩服。独到的见解、犀利的评论让枯燥的史书变得生动有趣，放佛看到吕老先生穿着长衫，踱着方步，激情洋溢的在面前讲课。
April 23, 2023
吕思勉先生大作《中国通史》一书由于成书于民国初年，部分语言习惯与今天略有差异，再加之书中大量引用文言文原典，读起来还是颇费劲的。但这本书仍然是关于中国历史的集大成之作，不妨慢读。历史正所谓“古今多少事，都付笑谈中。”
人类所崇拜的灵界，其实是虚无缥缈的，都是人所想象造作出来的。所以所谓灵界，其实还是人间世界的反映。人类社会的组织变化了，灵界的组织，也是要跟着变化的。我们现在所看到的，其第一步，便是从部族时代进于封建时代的变化。
诸多出版社为销量计，将史学大师吕思勉先生的多部中国史相关著作均改名为更为大众熟知的《中国通史》混淆视听。我们所熟知的《中国通史》，实际上是吕先生所著《吕著中国通史》一书。
人类所崇拜的灵界，其实是虚无缥缈的，都是人所想象造作出来的。所以所谓灵界，其实还是人间世界的反映。人类社会的组织变化了，灵界的组织，也是要跟着变化的。我们现在所看到的，其第一步，便是从部族时代进于封建时代的变化。
诸多出版社为销量计，将史学大师吕思勉先生的多部中国史相关著作均改名为更为大众熟知的《中国通史》混淆视听。我们所熟知的《中国通史》，实际上是吕先生所著《吕著中国通史》一书。
January 10, 2022
后面政治史大概像流水账，真正能体现作者功力的前面的“各论”，考据多，史论结合，部分地方有自己独到的见解，比如选举篇的官学部分，内外轻重之王朝的最终结局，王莽改制的分析等等。后面政治史有点民族主义的情绪，但放在当时情况下可以理解。语言半文半白，比较艰涩。
October 16, 2023
文化史部分是这本书的精华，内容非常多。大量引用的古书论据是直接夹杂在原文中的，而不是但单独做一个注释或者用其他字体区别，读起来还是有点费劲。
February 15, 2020
很好的历史导读
March 24, 2020
Best Chinese history book I've read!
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8 reviews