Glasser’s thesis is that the Kingdom of God is one of the central, overarching themes of the Scripture, and if we trace this motif through both testaments, we will better understand God’s mission in the world and have greater insight as to the church’s mission in today’s world.
In the first half of the book, Glasser demonstrates that the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) are an expectation of the Kingdom of God, while in the second half, he shows that the New Testament describes the arrival of the Kingdom and its never ending nature. In the first three sections he demonstrates that God is Creator, Judge and Redeemer, and therefore King. As King, he demonstrates his power over Egypt and forms a covenant people for Himself – Israel. In time, the kings of Israel challenge His rule, so God sends his people into exile to set the stage for the Messiah. The stage is now set for the second half of the book where Jesus announces and inaugurates the Kingdom, and the Spirit enables the church to proclaim the Kingdom of God, which is already but not yet. He concludes by examining the book of Revelation to demonstrate the continued theme of King and Kingdom from creation to the renewed heaven and earth.
What I liked most about this book is that Glasser helps us to view the entire text with a missional lens. He is able to draw out rich missional lessons from each section of scripture, whether it is from the life of Abraham, the life of Israel, the church or Jesus himself. The rich quotes that are sprinkled throughout the text often caused me to stop and ponder our awesome God and His mission. Throughout the book he helps us to remember God’s heart for all nations, and calls us to partner with our missional God to bring about His kingdom, always reminding us that our mission is in good hands – the hands of our triune God.
While the theme of missio dei was traced from Genesis to Revelation, some themes of God’s mission seemed incoherent. For example, in the chapter on the powers, he states, “…they [the powers:] do this through incarnating themselves in existing structures in society and in cultural traditions and religious institutions” (337) and states that “Paul goes beyond the familiar New Testament thesis that Christ’s redemption delivers his people from the guilt of sin… Paul speaks of Christ as One who also liberates his people from… bondage to the powers.” (336) Yet when talking about Jesus he said, “While he advocated sharing with the poor, he did not condemn the economic system that helped make people rich.” Glasser might benefit by reading Wink’s triology on The Powers That Be and Ched Myers Binding the Strong Man.
With that said, I deeply appreciate Glasser’s humility as he closes his book (373), admitting to “truths that have appeared to conflict” and imperfect perception. His humility causes me to humble myself before our awesome missional God for His service.