“Gather round while I sing you of Wernher von Braun.
a man whose allegiance is ruled by expedience.
Call him a Nazi, he won’t even frown.
‘Nazi, Schmazi,’ says Wernher von Braun.”
This was the caricature Tom Lehrer painted of the renowned rocket scientist behind the German V-2. Lehrer’s von Braun was a cynical opportunist, someone who served different masters depending on whichever regime happened to be funding his rockets that year. In Lehrer’s telling, accusations of blood on his hands are brushed aside with a shrug:
“ 'Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That’s not my department,' says Wernher von Braun. "
From being the subject of satirical songs to being the inspiration for the title character in Stanley Kubrick's 'Dr. Strangelove', von Braun’s character was flattened into all sorts of molds, but how much of it is true? More than that, what was his place within the US-Soviet Space Race? And most important of all, what of his shadowy Soviet rival, a man who lived in almost complete obscurity and was known to the West (and to most of his countrymen ) by the opaque title of “Chief Designer”?
The book traces the development of the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union by a parallel exposition of the life and trials of the two extraordinary men who were its chief architects: Wernher von Braun and his nemesis Sergei Pavlovich Korolev.
The chapters alternate between von Braun and Korolev, but it’s not simply the story of space as a theater of an ideological Darwinian struggle for supremacy in the Cold War. It’s also a celebration, a commemoration, and a salute to all the pioneers (American and Soviet) who gambled their lives for the sake of furthering the goals of their respective homelands and yet in the process, widened the reach of the human spirit effectively liberating it from the shackles of earthly gravity.
The author explores how a simple dream of reaching for the stars carried both von Braun and Korolev into parallel paths, paths that even though pointed to the same end, carried wholly different caveats for both of them. Korolev was put in the Gulag during Stalin’s purges, tearing his family apart and nearly breaking him, only to find himself back in Stalin’s good graces due to the military need of achieving an advantage over the West in matters of rocketry, and using his engineering expertise to unlock the secrets of the German V-2 blueprints and components that fell into the hands of the Red Army after the fall of the Reich. This eventually led him to become the head of the Soviet space program.
Von Braun on the other hand, starts in categorically different circumstances. Born into aristocracy, he was recruited by the Nazi state to help her in producing its wonder weapons. His V-2 rocket became an emblem of both his pioneering vision and the marriage of the scientific explorer with the practical military needs of the army. This association, and his actions within this marriage will forever stain his reputation, (irreparably to some). He, too, found an employer after the war in the form of a world superpower. He, too, would be recruited to squeeze the last bit of technical know-how out of the German missile program. And he, too, would find himself heading an organization with the chief objective of conquering space...the difference being the ideology in whose name this crusade was to be held.
Both Korolev and von Braun, and hence the US and USSR, followed a similar progress (although it was a progress in which initially the Soviets claimed the lead) : conquering Earth’s orbit with metallic emissaries, then people, and ultimately putting this new breed of men, astronauts and cosmonauts, on the Moon.
The author periodically contrasts the circumstances of the Soviet space program with that of its US counterpart. While Korolev suffered from a lack of funds, political interference, non-existent testing facilities/infrastructure for his N-1 rocket engines, rivalry with his colleagues, not to mention bureaucratic inertia, von Braun had generous funding from the world’s wealthiest state, and he oversaw an organization where the atmosphere was an embodiment of the free market of ideas, where disagreements were encouraged, and the natural selection of concepts was based on their feasibility for space purposes and not forced to fit the mold of military utility.
My only critique is that the book concludes with the Moon landings of the Apollo program, while I would have wanted a more exhaustive exploration of the other missions as well (I was waiting for a treatment of the Venera missions, but alas, none was forthcoming).
I found the topic to be fascinating, the author’s treatment of it absorbing, and the narrative style to be the perfect balance between background information, the humanizing of the two central figures as complex individuals, and a drama tethered to historical facts. It is a must-read even if you are only vaguely interested in the topic. Highly recommended.
Seeing that, as I started with von Braun, it is only suitable to conclude with him as well, I cannot help but think of a famous quote often attributed to him ('attributed' is a strong word here). Whether the quote is true or of fictional origins is beside the point, for I think it perfectly identifies that most elusive strain in his character, one that is often squeezed out for the sake of simplifying an entire life experience to fit a not so complex caricature which affirms our beliefs. For Werner, his unbound obsession with anything to do with space, a curiosity that did not allow him the grace of containing his excitement when discussing such matters with others, was continuously held down firm to the ground by the practical needs of earthly matters, forcing him to surrender his vision for the sake of utility (though it helped that, and the space race is a testament to this, sometimes..just sometimes... both practicality and vision might converge to form something so beautifully inspiring).
It was rumored that when the first V-2 hit London he remarked to some of his colleagues: “The rocket worked perfectly except for landing on the wrong planet.”
Rating: 4/5.