I really had high hopes for this chick-lit novel. I mean, it was being compared to the best of Edith Wharton on the inside flap! Clearly I should not be as naive as to believe everything that is written for a book promotion. I am especially glad I did not pay for this book; while I'm willing to shell out for certain guilty pleasure novels (Sweet Valley series, I'm lookin' at you!) One Fifth Avenue isn't even worth the paper on which it's printed.
The politics surrounding housing co-ops are interesting, so this had the potential to be more compelling. I've never been in a building like that, but I've lived in places where the development board is super strict and can be bribed and swayed into making certain decisions. The characters however, are not realistic at all. There isn't a single male character with whom I could sympathize. I often consider myself a bit of a male-hater, but even I can't go this far; the males are either conniving, greedy, and snobbish, or emasculated, or so focused on their sexual urges they seem less like Homo sapiens and more like gorillas. Most of the women aren't much better, as they are either vapid, idiotic, greedy, and social-climbing, or spineless liars. By far, the most hateable character in the novel is Lola Fabrikant, a 22 year old obsessed with bedding wealthy men so that she doesn't need to work a single day in her life. She connives to stay on top, but because she is so idiotic, she can't even gain my sympathies as a bitchy, over-the-top villain with biting retorts. She just seems dumb and shallow, the type of person I'd like to slap silly if I ever met. She also never learns or grows as a person; I kept looking for character development and personal growth, but she essentially stays the same from the first pages to the last.
Bushnell's description of wealth also seems a far cry from reality. In what world are the Gooches, with nearly a million in savings, considered middle class? Middle class is lower six-figures in income and below, and that's pushing it. Mindy Gooch is not only a shrill harpy, but a bad mother, letting her son get away with cutting another resident's (Paul Rice) Internet cables and causing him to lose millions. Even though Paul Rice is supposed to be a child-hating villain, I felt it was an injustice to allow the kid to get away with vandalism and what could have been disasterous if Rice had been working with national security issues. Philip doesn't deserve Schiffer--he's so focused on sex and appearing with a younger woman that it makes him lose his spine and never let Lola go. Why exactly would Schiffer want someone who cannot make decisions for himself? His aunt Enid took care of Lola--he couldn't even do that for himself. And because of the lack of characterization, I'm not sure why Philip didn't want to marry Schiffer from the get-go. She seems to be the only female character that cooks not only for herself but for her lover as well and seems to be reasonably intelligent. I don't buy Philip's excuse that she was too flighty; if anything, this could describe Philip himself. The lack of intelligent narrative voice (something Wharton did extremely well) means the reader cannot grasp these complexities.
The whole deal with the Bloody Mary cross was introduced, but was a poor plot device. I kept wondering if the cross would lead to something significant because it was mentioned several times early on, but then the book shifted focus onto Philip's and, to a lesser degree, Paul Gooch's sex lives. When the importance was finally revealed, it wasn't that significant and I figured out the twist. With so many characters, it was hard to figure out why seemingly unimportant characters that didn't get much paragraph space (Paul Rice, Billy Litchfield, Sandy and Sandy's dancer wife, and Flossie) were supposed to inspire the reader's sympathy. Many of those background characters had the glimmers of personality and conscience, but they, plus Enid and Schiffer as well, were given the shaft. Thus, there was almost no character that became redeemed at all. It makes me wonder what the point of the novel was.