1 star [Theology]
I have a rule about finishing books before writing a review. Thus, I finished this book only to warn the world against self-published authors who claim to be “Greek experts.” Self-published, you ask? The publisher is “a division of Rick Renner Ministries.” Any neutral publisher with one semester of exegetical training would have used the manuscript for toilet paper. I am sorry for the emotional effect this scathing review could evoke, because Renner is a brother in Christ. However, books must be judged on their merits, not on the piety, intentions, or even good missionary work of their authors. Corruption of scholarship is a detriment to Biblical Studies.
Writing: 0.5 stars (Awful)
My Writing category’s 1-star description is “Frustrating,” but that would be too generous in this case. Hyperbole and dumbed-down prose are constant. The book repeats entire paragraphs. It employs exclamation marks and italics like a conspiracy theorist with a free blog. It artificially balloons concordance words into text, ranging from paragraphs to pages long. The book ends at page 463, but if one were to take out every iteration of the words “very,” “extremely,” “always,”—and every other fluffy adjective, adverb, and superfluous phrase typically found in 3rd-grade essays, one might reduce the page count by 100.
Use: 1 star (as an Example of Gaping Holes)
Dressed to Kill is the best example I know of that warps Greek glosses into ill-fit, campy preaching characterized by unnecessary points. The book’s only academic use would be to exemplify exegetical fallacies to the analytical student who—having read an exegetical textbook like Carson or Barr—thought that their examples of fallacies were contrived, or couldn't happen in real life. Renner provides hundreds of them.
Truth: mostly 0.5 (Patently Untrue), with a small amount of 2.5 (Common Knowledge).
Exegetical fallacies riddle nearly every original-language attempt Renner makes. His knowledge of Greek seems wholly imprisoned by The Etymological Fallacy, and dependent upon facile concordances like Strong’s (which is so worthless in real exegesis that I was forbidden to use it in seminary). Apparently, none of his knowledgeable friends or colleagues have directed him to the last 100 years of linguistic theory.
The only bit of this book that rises to the mediocre is his spiritual application. Decent truths exist in some of them, but they are the sort most Christians have heard if they have gone to church more than a handful of years.
Finally, he ends the book by adding a seventh piece of “armor” to the Bible’s six—the lance. He says Paul “clearly” had it in mind, without making any argument for it. He just asserts it a few times over the course of a few pages, then takes it for granted.
Conclusion
I implore you, reader: do not be deceived by glowing reviews of this book written by people who have possibly never even spelled the word “exegesis.” Stay away from the works of original-language gurus who fabricate meaning based upon homiletic expedience. If you receive this book as a gift, truly its best redemption is providing fuel for a winter fire. Even re-gifting it will propagate corruption of the study of Biblical Greek, making it harder for non-scholars to enjoy the beauties and glory of the New Testament.