In 1975, Ed made a startling discovery: all the great extended poems of the 20th century (and I quote him): “The Wasteland, The Bridge, the Cantos, W. C. Williams’ Paterson” – (page 15) all required historical research. The Romantic notion that poets are fed by inspiration, not by study, is a myth. Why can’t poets rewrite history – and, by doing so, MAKE history?
In the summer of 1975 – to give a historical background to his poetical historicity – Ed delivered a version of this book as a lecture at the Counterculture Festival in Montréal. Ed gave me this copy, just recently republished by Spuyten Duyvil Press (in their “Dispatches Editions”) and I read his manifesto for the first time. “My God! I should’ve been practicing Investigative Poetry these last 43 years,” I realized. But maybe in some inchoate way I have been. For example, here’s a poem of mine:
Favorite Clues
9 down, 12 down, 17 across
[New York Times crossword puzzle, April 13, 2013]
Let me open Investigative Poetry at random:
We have already mentioned Blake’s work on the French Revolution which he decided not to print; and the later work of Pushkin; how all this talk how poets calm down, how they “come to terms with it,” how they become “more objective” is bunk from a punk…
(Written around the time of the birth of Punk music…)